Forouzan: Iranian Actress in 1960s and 1970s

February 8, 2016

“In recent days many said: ‘Forouzan, the Iranian film star, died in Tehran; Forouzan, a famous star of Iran’s Cinema in 1960s & 1970s, died in Iran’. Unfortunately, it’s not a rumor; Forouzan died in 2016 at the age of 78. Forouzan didn’t give any interviews after 1979. People heard nothing & knew nothing about her and her life after 1979. So it’s not clear what has happened to her. But it’s clear why Iranians like Forouzan, but hate Islamists and Islamic Whores”, some wise Iranians say. They also add: “Forouzan was one of many victims of the 1979 Fetneh, aka Fetneh 57. Before 1979, Forouzan and most Iranians didn’t know Islamic whores, CIA’s Islamists, MI6’s Islam or Islamic Turkmenchay / Fetneh etc. But the 1979 Fetneh and its consequences made Iranians aware. Now after the Islamic Turkmenchay, even idiots can see How Islamists and Ayatollahs work for CIA, MI6 and Great Satan. Now even the 3% (ie regime’s supporters) ridicule Islamic Lies & Islamic Paradoxes. It’s so laughable and so important. Now even the 3% and Westerners talk about ‘the Death of Islamic Revolution’ or the End of Islamic Ideology in Iran! Now their own analysts write about ‘the Death of Islamic Revolution’, and say: ‘Now the Ayatollah’s ‘Death to America’ chants (just make people laugh) Everybody knows the boat is leaking! (ie Islamic Revolution is dying) Everybody knows that the Captain lied’ ! Now the Islamic Turkmenchay is showing & explaining why the UK and the CIA created the 1979 Fetneh, aka Fetneh 57 or Islamic Revolution. We all should thank those idiots who created the Islamic Turkmenchay!, because now even idiots and the 3% can see why the so-called 1979 Islamic Revolution was CIA Fetneh, MI6 Fetneh, Masonic-British Fetneh or a Jewish-Satanic-Arabic Fetneh against Iran. Mullahs love Fetneh, and use this term a lot. But the real meaning of Fetneh is ‘an Orwellian Plot; a secret plan by bad guys to do Evil things in the name of good things’. In fact, what the West and Mullahs did in 1979 was a Fetneh or a Satanic Plot against Iran & Iranians. It’s funny that now even Westerners & American Lefts talk about ‘Secrets of Islamic Revolution’, CIA’s Ayatollahs, CIA’s Islamists and why Khomeini was a CIA agent ! Those who read history and think about today & true facts can see the differences between Conspiracy Theories & True History. What Mullahs, France, UK and US do today are a real eye-opener, and say a lot about the past. Now even little kids ask: ‘When today, at the age of internet / information, they censor all news/ facts, tell Big lies, and make love in a silly way, then what did they really do in the past?!’ ! Now even Americans talk about the Secrets of the 1979 Fetneh, and the systematic relations between the 1953 Coup & the 1979 Coup in Iran! Now even the 3% can see How Ayatollahs lick the ass of Anti-Iran France or Britain, and why Rouhani, Khamenei & Zarif are Masonic slaves of France, Britain and CIA. Now even non-Iranians and the 3% refer to the Mullah Islam or Saudi Islam as CIA’s Islam, MI6’s Islam or Jewish / Masonic Islam! Recent events are important. Now the story of Spy Swap (aka Prisoner Swap) between Mullahs & Great Satan is a historic Farce, and clearly shows why America = Islamist Regime, or why the Judiciary system in America is as corrupt as the Mullah judiciary system. Recent events show that Big Brother and CIA control America -from the media to the judiciary. The story of CIA’s Whores like Jason Rezaian & Siamak Namazi and the story of Spy Swap (Prisoner Swap) say a lot about America & Ayatollahs; so now even idiots can see why the United States = the Mullah regime, or why Iranians say: Death to Ayatollah America! Recent events and recent years clearly show & prove why America = Ayatollahs, Saudis and Islamic Dictators. Now even Westerners say: America and Saudi Arabia are as savage as each other! (Time, Jan 2016) Now even idiots talk about the Love story of ‘Savage Arabia, America and Ayatollahs’ ! Now even the 3% talk about Islamic Nekbat / Zellat and How Mullahs lick the ass of Anti-Iran France, Britain & Estekbar (= Imperialism) !”. As some wise Iranians say: “Now it’s obvious why all Iranians hate Ayatollahs & Masonic-Islamic Whores, and why most Iranians like or defend Foruzan – who is famous for her dances and her se-xy-comic roles in Persian films. It’s obvious why Iranians praise Foruzan, and say: Foruzan was so much better than (Sag-esh Sharaf dasht beh) Islamists, (Journalists & Masonic whores) Ayatollahs and Islamists are Sag Maz-hab! Ayatollahs and Islamists say: Dance, Music, Arts, Joy, Happiness & other good things are bad, but Lying, Stealing, Raping, Killing, Barbarity, Slavery, Savagery and other Evil things are good ! (In Iran, Sag Maz-hab or Sag Massab is a funny slang term that means: someone who has a shitty Orwellian Religion, in which Iranian values (aka Human values) are bad things, but Barbarian values and Evil things are good things!)”.


“Forouzan (1937- 2016), born Parvin Kheirbakhsh, was a famous sexy-comic actress in Iran. She had her own weak points, her own stupidities, and her own problems. But Iran’s people truly say: Forouzan was so much better than Ayatollahs, Basijis and Islamic whores’ ! (Forouzan Sag-esh Sharaf dasht beh Akhund, Basiji … ) Forouzan was not saint or angel. Forouzan was not intellectual. Forouzan was an entertainer. But idiots cannot understand such things. They even cannot understand the differences between Entertainment & Ass-Licking (Khayemali), as they cannot understand the differences between Clowns & Intellectuals”, some wise Iranians say. They also add : “Islamists and Ayatollahs say: Lying is worse than Adultery! But from morning to night, they tell many Big lies! Mullahs and Islamists are slaves of sex, money & power. But it’s funny that Islamic whores and Islamic Rapists pretend that they hate s-ex! Of course all Iranians know that Mullahs and Islamists are rapists, s-ex addicts or charlatans; many of them are drug addicts (= Amali), too. Mullahs and Islamists are crooks, thieves, liars and charlatans. Now all Iranians (+97%) are aware of this issue. Now people can see that Savage Arabs, Mullahs and Islamists worship Satan, and that’s why Islamists love Lying, Stealing, Thievery, Killing, Raping, Barbarity and other Evil things. In fact, Mullahs and Islamists are Sag Maz-hab”. They also add: “After the 1979 Fetneh, Forouzan was banned from acting in any film. Forouzan never gave any interviews and did not attend any public events after 1979. (We don’t know) why Forouzan was silent. But we Iranians know why Islamists and Islamic whores attack Forouzan, but defend Lying, Stealing, Raping, Barbarity, Nekbat, Zellat and Turkmenchay. Freemasons and Islamists are Sag Maz-hab! Now Islamic whores attack dance and dancers, while Masonic whores pretend beautiful cunt = beautiful mind ! The West and Freemasons love stupid cu-nts (= Kos Khola) And it’s clear why Both the West and Mullahs pretend that stupid cunts are intellectuals! You know the main meaning of cu-nt. You also know that, according to dictionaries, cu-nt also means: ‘a stupid or unpleasant person’. Cu-nt & stupid cu-nt are slang terms in both Persian and English. But it’s funny that the West and its stooges pretend a stupid & unpleasant person or a stupid cu-nt is Intellectual ! The West and its puppets use entertainment, modeling and fashion world to control people and to enslave people. But the witty Iranians say: ‘some people want to be fashion models, singers, dancers, actors, por-n stars or journalists. It’s not bad. She or he has a beautiful face, tits, ass etc. It’s not bad, and people can enjoy it. But the main problem is that they pretend a beautiful face, tits or ass = a beautiful mind ! They say Cu-nt is Kant or Celebrity = Intellectual ! They say a beautiful cu-nt is a beautiful mind; and it’s the main problem! In the West, they want to control and enslave people; so they encourage people to worship celebrities or beautiful cu-nts. But in Iran, we say: OK, she or he is a beautiful cu-nt; she or he is a top model; she or he has physical attractions; we have no problem with physical attractions; we have no problem with beautiful cu-nt, tits etc. We like them! But we don’t worship them … But they pretend that a beautiful cunt is a beautiful mind! And it’s the main problem!”. As some wise Iranians say: “You all know what Fashion Model, Dummy or Mankan (Manikin) mean. As you know, dummy also means ‘someone who is stupid’. In fact, dummy (= Mankan) is not intellect or thinker! But both the West and Dictators pretend that a dummy (Mankan) is an intellectual. Both the West and Dictators use dummies or celebrities to fool and control people. They ask people to worship celebrities, because they use shop-window dummies or celebrities to control and deceive people. In Iran, Islamic clowns like Rambod Javan and other Masonic-Islamic whores pretend that a beautiful cu-nt is a beautiful mind. But the witty Iranians say: OK, you can have a beautiful eye, nose, face, cu-nt, tits etc. It’s a good thing; and people can like and admire your physical attractions; but it doesn’t make you a thinker, intellectual etc ! (…) But Masonic whores, Islamic whores, CIA’s whores, BBC’s whores and Big Brother’s whores ask people to worship celebrities, and pretend that a pretty ass is equal to a good thinker !”.


“Forouzan didn’t pretend that she is a thinker or intellect. Forouzan knew that she is just an entertainer. She knew her limits (know your limits = know what you are good at doing and what you are not good at) But stupid Celebrities don’t know their limits. Stupid cu-nts pose as Intellectuals, but they even cannot understand simple things. For instance, they cannot understand that you can like or dislike this or that music. They even don’t know that Music or Art is a matter of taste. Some have similar tastes in music, while many people don’t have similar tastes in music. But CIA’s whores and CIA’s GoozAli cannot understand such obvious things. They even don’t know that sometimes you are in the mood or in no mood for this or that music”, some wise Iranians say. They also add: “Forouzan was a sweet, funny and se-xy actress. Some of her se-xy-comedy films are funny films, and many of her se-xy-comic performances in Persian films (even in weak films) are admirable. Many Iranians (including us) like some of her sexy-comic roles in Persian films. Even compared to Hollywood’s actresses, Forouzan is a good comic actress. But Pahlavists (= Monarchists) tried to use her to fool & control people. Forouzan appeared in many cheap & weak films (= Abgushti films) Pahlavists, like Mullahs, tried to fool / control people with Abgushti works. All puppets of the West -from Mullahs to Monarchists- are the same shit. Monarchists, like Mullahs, used celebrities for political purposes and for brainwashing / enslaving people. The story of the so-called Film Farsi or Iran’s Cinema in Pahlavi era is a long story. And If you (write about) just one part of this long story, it can create misunderstanding”. It’s a good point. According to our own experiences, short articles or short posts can create misunderstanding or incorrect interpretations. Some of our posts in 2011 -including ‘Iranian Celebrities in 1970s & 2010s’ – have created some misunderstanding or incorrect interpretations. As some wise Iranians say: “Idiots don’t know the differences between Entertainer & Khayemal ! Idiots even don’t know that If celebrities become Khayemal ( = Ass-licker) and slaves of money & politics, and if celebrities help dictators / bad guys, then all Iranians will hate them. The story of Eftekhari, Habib and other Islamic whores in 2009 is so informative. Eftekhari was a famous singer in Iran, but when he became an Islamic whore and helped AN and Islamic dictators in 2009, all Iranians fucked Eftekhari, attacked him and sent him to the trash can of history. What Iranian people did to Eftekhari, Elham Charkhande and other Masonic-Islamic whores had clear & important messages”. They also add: “In 2009, celebrities like Shajarian refused to help Islamists. Before 2009 (we didn’t like Shajarian & his works) But after 2009, we and all Iranians respect him because he didn’t help dictators, and instead, he tried to help people in 2009. (We like Leila Forouhar and admire her) because she has many good points. Leila is on people’s side. After the 2009 Coup, Leila Forouhar sang a good song about Iran and 2009 events. (We like and admire Leila Forouhar) because she cares about Iranian values, good things & good guys. But if tomorrow Leila Forouhar would become dishonest & Khayemal, we don’t hesitate to condemn her. In the past, (we liked) Googoosh for the same reasons. But unfortunately, Googoosh is gradually becoming Dishonest or Khayemal in recent years. Googoosh has suffered a lot of pain in her life since her childhood. We Iranians had a lot of sympathy for her. But now Googoosh seems like a very naive / dumb blonde, and if she wants to help Dictators, Pahlavists or Islamists, we don’t hesitate to condemn her (…) In recent years (after 2011), Shahram Shab-Pareh has had some good TV interviews. In these interviews, he seems like a good, honest and open-minded Iranian. He even says good things about the Fucking America (ie Ayatollah America) and its real problems. (We don’t want) to judge him by rumors & by what media says about his family members and their relations with Mullahs & Mafia. If Shahram Shab-Pareh is really honest & open-minded and cares about human values, then (we all can see him) as a good guy. In recent years, NooshAfarin gave a good TV interview, too. In this interview, NooshAfarin seems like a beautiful, honest and open-minded woman. She says many good things”. They also add: “Being honest and being open-minded are so important, as being Human (Adam budan) is so important, and as caring about Iranian values (= Human values) and refusing to help Dictators/ Bad guys are so important. (We don’t expect) celebrities to be intellects, saints or angels! (We only expect) celebrities to not be Charlatan & Khayemal, and to care about Iranian values (aka Human values) Being honest and caring about Human values are so vital. Forouzan was not an intellectual. Forouzan was an Entertainer (= someone whose job is to entertain people) Forouzan was a successful entertainer in 1960s. As Iranian people truly say: Forouzan was so much better than (Sag-e Forouzan Sharaf Dasht beh) Ayatollahs and Islamic Whores like Deh-Namaki, Afkhami, Elham Chakhandeh, Merila Zarei, Bahareh Rahmana and other Islamic whores in Mullah TV & Mullah Cinema”.


As some wise Iranians say: “Now even idiots, the 3% and the Western analysts talk about the Death of Islamic Revolution and the Death of Islamic Ideology in Iran, mainly because the Islamic Turkmenchay is a real eye-opener. But now even if you take a look at their Islamic Cinema or Islamic sports stadiums, you can see that Mullahs and Islamists are totally bankrupt in Iran. Now even the 3% and the Mullah TV openly confess that their Islamic Cinema is totally bankrupt, and all Iranians hate Islamic Cinema and Islamic regime! In these days, even if you take a look at the Mullah TV & Islamic media in Iran, you can easily see the Death of their Islamic Ideology and the Death of their Islamic Revolution. For instance, Islamic media and a new Basiji TV called TV+ (TV plus) openly defend Islamic Corruption, Islamic Crooks & Islamic Thieves like Shahram Jazayeri Arab! Jazayeri Arab is an Arab/ Islamic version of Jack Abramoff, and a symbol of Islamic Corruption. But now the CIA Basiji TV+ and other Islamic media defend Jack Abramoff and Islamic Jack Abramoff ! Now this Arab-Islamic Jack Abramoff justifies himself & his Evil acts by Islam & his Islamic Morality! But now even the 3% know that what Islamists -from Saudis & ISIS to Jazayeri Arab- say about Islam is worse than all insulting remarks (az Sad ta Fosh Bad-tareh …) Now even little kids ask: ‘If notorious cooks & thieves justify their Evil acts and their Thievery by Islam, and If Islamic Barbarians, Savage Arabs, Dictators, Mullahs and ISIS justify their Evil acts- ie their Barbarity, Turkmenchay, Tyranny, Savagery etc- by Islam, then what would happen?! This would encourage people to like Islam or to hate it?!’ ! Now their Islamic Fetneh -from 1979 Fetneh to Saudi / ISIS Fetneh- remind many of this fact that British Masons used to say: You should cut the head of religion with the sword of religion! It’s obvious what would happen if dictators, charlatans, crooks, thieves and barbarians defend Religion and justify their Evil acts by Religion! If you read history, you can see what happened in European Middle Age and what is the story of ‘The Death of Religion’ in Europe. (As the wise & witty Iranians say: ) Religious people should be worried about ‘The Death of Religion’; it’s none of our business. But now when US analysts and CIA pigs write about ‘the Death of Islamist Religion’ or the End of Islamic Ideology in Iran, they stupidly pretend that it’s equal to the Death of Iranian values, the Death of Morality/ Ethics, the Death of Iranian Traditions and the Rise of American-British-Barbarian values! They actually express their wishes and part of their plans in 1979 – part of the 1979 Fetneh. Now they talk about China’s Model ! But now all Iranians care about Iran and Iranian Legacy. The Death of Islamist Religion/ Regime is just equal to The End of Ajnabi and their Jewish-Arabic-Masonic Ideology in Iran. Iranian values / Human values are independent of religion & politics (we have already written about ‘Morality, Ethics and Religion’, and why Ethics and Human values are independent of Religion; check Archive)”. They also add: “Now Mullahs and their Islamic Lies & Islamic Paradoxes clearly show that Mullahs and Islamists are ‘Sag Maz-hab’ or Devil-worshipers. Now If you take a look at Mullah TV and Basiji TV+ you can easily see that Mullahs and Islamists are followers of Machiavelli (ie their Hazrat-e Machiavelli !) Now even the 3% talk about why ISIS & Islamists are Anti-Religion, or why Islamists don’t believe in God ! Now the ISIS-Islamic Fetneh and the Islamic Turkmenchay -from Nuclear deal to Oil Turkmenchay- are making the 3% aware (= Khar-Fahm) So now even the 3% ridicule Islamic Lies & Islamic Whores. Recent events say a lot about the Death of Islamic Revolution and the Secrets of 1979 Fetneh, aka Fetneh 57”.


As some wise Iranians say: “Now Islamic whores can show you many things about the Death of Islamic Revolution or the Death of Islamic Ideology in Iran. For instance, Behrouz Afkhami is an Islamic whore and an Islamic Psychopath ( = Bimar-e Ravani or Divooneh Zanjiri !) He works in Mullah TV & Mullah Cinema. Afkhami is a CIA Basiji or CIA Islamist who poses as a Reformist or Intellect, but openly defends Hitler, Fascists, Bashar Assad, Dictatorship and Dictators. Behrouz Afkhami is an Islamic Psycho who openly says that he is Charlatan and Opportunist! Afkhami openly says (in Mullah TV): ‘I can sell myself to politicians .. if they pay me good money, I can compromise my Islamic principles (!) .. I am proud to be charlatan / Opportunist (!) .. if they pay me enough money, I can compromise so easily, and I can do something which is against our Islamic slogans and Islamic values (!!) .. they can buy me & my Islamic principles/ standards, if they pay me good money (!!)’ (2015) Can you believe it?! Islamists and Afkhami are Sag Maz-hab & La Maz-hab! Islamists are stupid Psychos & Sadists. In recent months, this CIA’s Islamist Afkhami openly says (in Mullah TV): ‘I know all intellectuals hate me; I know Iranian people hate me; but I don’t care .. Me and my friends (= Islamists) love to hurt you Iranians and to make you angry (!) But we want to know which of us is the Best (Islamic Sadists) If you send us SMS and tell us how much you hate us (!), and which of us make you angrier (!), then we give you a gold coin (!) We know that you Iranians hate us, and we (Islamists) make you angry, but we want to know which of us make you angrier (!!) …’ ! (2015) Can you believe it?! Now Islamic Sadists and CIA’s Islamists openly say such things in their Mullah TV ! So now even idiots can see why all Iranians hate Islamists, or why people talk about Islamic Sadism, Islamic Insanity, Islamic Psychos, Islamic Lies, Islamic Bankruptcy etc. Afkhami and all Islamists are ‘Sag Maz-hab’. They have no humanity, no morality & no principle, but they pretend that they are ‘Men of God’ & ‘Men of Principles’ ! They even call themselves ‘Principle-ists’ ! or ‘Men of Religious Integrity’ ! (…) This CIA Islamist Psycho, Behrouz Afkhami, is a symbol of Islamic Cinema after the 1979 Fetneh. So it’s obvious why all Iranians hate Islamic Cinema and Islamic Regime”. They also add: “Now even idiots can see why it’s so important and meaningful that Iranian people like Forouzan & Dancers, but hate Ayatollahs & Islamists. Iranian people see that Ayatollahs & Islamists are Sag Maz-hab. Now even the 3% can see why Islamists are Satanists, and why Rouhanis are Satan’s children. Now even the 3% and their State TV confess that their Islamic regime is worse than Pahlavi & Qajars! Now even the 3% and their TV talk about Oil Turkmenchay & Death of Islamic Revolution! Now the Islamic Turkmenchay -from Nuclear deal to Oil Turkmenchay- says a lot about the 1979 Fetneh (…) Now Basiji TVs & Mullah Media praise the Taqoot era ! (= Pahlavi era) Now if you take a look at their new Basij TV+ (TV plus), you can see new things. For instance, Bahman Mofid is in Tehran, and Basijis praise him! Basijis already said people like Bahman Mofid are Taqooti & icons of Taqoot Era ! But now Basijis and their Basij TV+ praise the so-called icons of Taqoot era! Their Islamic Lies & Paradoxes say a lot about the Death of their Islamic Revolution. Now Islamists and Basij TV+ do interview with M & P ( = MalekMotiei & Pouri Banaie)! But M & P say good things, and actually reveal the depth of the bankruptcy of Islamists & Western puppets in Iran. If M & P become dishonest or Khayemal, people will hate them and (we will condemn them). But now everybody knows the real meaning of recent events. Now even their own Keyhan newspaper talks about the Death of Islamic Revolution and says: ‘Now we should ask Pahlavi & Hoveyda to return and to rule Islamic regime (!!) (Dige Bayad Begim Shah & Hoveyda Bargardan .. !! ) But Iranians say to Basijis: Yah, your Islamic regime is dying, but you should ask Shah Sultan Hussein to return! Your beloved King is Shah Sultan Hussein, and after your Islamic Turkmenchay you should ask Shah Sultan Hussein to come back and to save your Islamic regime !”. They also add: “Dancers are entertainers. Real whores are those who defend Tyranny, Turkmenchay, Rouhanis or Western Bullies/ Barbarians. You can like or dislike the old Persian dancers/ actors including Foruzan, Jamileh, Haleh, Aram, LiLi, Shurangiz (…) Real whores are those who defend Sadism, Fascism, Barbarity, Tyranny & Turkmenchay. Film stars are entertainers. Real whores are those who defend Ayatollahs, American Fascists/ Sadists and French / British Barbarians. Real whores are those who have sold their souls and their humanity, and defend Dictators, Fascists, Barbarians and Jewish-Islamic Nekbat / Zellat“.


“There are many rumors about Forouzan and her life. In these days, you can hear all sorts of rumors about Forouzan and her life. Unfortunately, Forouzan, her family and her close friends said nothing, and still say nothing, about her life after the 1979 Fetneh. It’s so shameful that even her old friends -including Malek-Motiei, Pouri Banaie or Bahman Mofid who have recently become active in Basiji TVs or Mullah Cinema – say nothing about Forouzan and her life. It’s so shameful that her old friends and almost all Iranian film stars say nothing about Forouzan, Forouzan’s silence or Forouzan’s life in Iran under the Mullah regime”, some wise Iranians say. They also add: “Now even Islamic whores of Islamic Cinema confess that the Mullah Cinema is much worse than Film Farsi ( = Pahlavi’s Cinema) ! Now even Islamic whores confess that their Islamic Cinema is totally bankrupt, and all Iranians hate Islamic Cinema & Islamic Regime. Now even idiots can see why almost all Iranians care about Forouzan, but hate Islamists & Islamic Cinema (…) Who are Islamic moralists or their Islamic celebrities?! Islamic moralists are Sadists, Charlatans, Liars, or Crooks & Thieves like CIA’s Nasseri (Halliburton’s man), Jazayeri Arab, Iraq-chi, Haeri, Makarem, Mesbah and other Anti-Iranian Arab Freemasons. Their Islamic celebrities are whores and faggots like TaTali, Amali or Afkhami ! In the best case, their Islamic celebrity is an Islamic Whore like Ferdosi-pour – who is Ajnabi-parast, Rohani-parast, UK-parast and Europe-parast ! (X-parast = X-worshiper) Ayatollahs and Islamic whores including Ferdosi-pour are Anti-Iran and Anti-Persian. They stupidly try to pretend that Iranians are bad, but Western Sadists, Western Idiots, Arab or British Barbarians are good ! They try to promote Ajnabi-Parasti (= worshiping the West) and Khod-Bakhtegi (= destroying national self-esteem), and to degrade Iran, Iranians, National Pride, Independence, Sovereignty and Progress in Iran So it’s obvious why the CIA and MI6 love Ayatollahs and Basijis -from Mesbah, Haeri & Zibakalam to Ferdosi-pour. Compared to Ayatollahs & Islamic whores, Forouzan seems like a saint or angel !”. They also add: “Iranians know obvious things. We know that being sexy is not bad; being slave of se-x is bad. Being Slave of se-x, slave of money, slave of religion or slave of the West is bad. Se-x is not bad; being Ayatollah / Akhund is bad, ie being Liar, Charlatan, Mason, Crook, Thief or Barbarian is bad. Iranians know obvious things, and that’s why they ridicule British-Islamic Lies and American-Islamic Paradoxes. Real whores defend Rouhanis, Turkemchany or Western Sadists/ Fascists. But Iranian people refer to these stupid whores as the Regime’s whores (Faheshe Hokumati), BBC’s whores or Masonic / Islamic whores etc. Iran’s people know Political whores, and hate them. Now all Iranians hate Islamic whores -from Ayatollahs to Rouhanists & BBC’s whores”. They also add: “The West and its stooges ask people to worship celebrities. They even say all girls should become models or se-x objects! They stupidly encourage all youths to become models or slaves of fashion. According to dictionaries, ‘Model = some one whose job is to show clothes, hair styles, bodies etc’. In Iran, Dummy and Model are often called Mankan (Manikin) Being Model is not bad. But the US & the West ask or encourage all girls & boys to become Mankan or Model. They actually ask all people to become slaves -slaves of fashion, slaves of se-x, slaves of money, politics, religion etc. And it’s obvious why they want to create more slaves or more sheeple. In the West and the World of Big Brothers, public figures and celebrities are shop-window dummies, who try to shape, deceive and control public opinions (…) Big Brothers use many dirty tricks. But now even non-Iranian historians say: ‘the father of all Islamists, Mullah Al-Afghani wrote: We want to cut the head of religion with the sword of religion .. the method used to this end is the practice of a false but showy devotion‘ ! Now even idiots and the 3% can see the truths. The Islamic Turkmenchay is making them aware. Now Islamists and Islamic celebrities are non-believers and charlatans/ whores like Rambod, Juleh, Tatali, Amali or Afkhami. But in an Ideological system or an Ideological regime it’s equal to The End, to The Death of Ideology. When fans and supporters of an ideology are non-believers and those who have a fake but showy devotion, then it’s equal to The End or Death of that Ideology”.

Nothing But the Truth (2008)

October 12, 2012

In these days, most Iranians are angry at the US and know that the US is the number one enemy of the freedom and democracy in Iran. But in these days, even those who care about the truth are sad or angry, because the main issue is more important than Iran or USA. The main issue is “Truth”. Some ask us: “Do you only care about Iran?” We, the authors of this website, just care about the truth. We don’t care about Iran, USA, Europe or any other countries. Our criticisms of the US, the West, the Mullahs, the Iranian figures, and others don’t have any political, racial, or ideological reasons. We criticize them, because they betray the truth and tell big shameful lies. In the near future, we will publish some strong criticisms of the US and the West, because our motto in this website is: ‘Nothing But the Truth’. As you probably know, it’s an old motto. It’s the motto of the great men in the human history. We all should care about it. But in these years, many people have forgotten it, and many idiots betray the truth. They only care about mercenary money, and help the bad guys in creating tyranny, control, corruption, and other evil things. Unfortunately, the media, the journalists, and the intellects in the West get money and betray everything. They censor the news, distort the truth, and behave like the Mullahs. They are paid to betray the truth, and it’s one of the most important problems in today’s West. Those public figures that get money and betray the truth and the people, are definitely bad guys. They live like animals at the bottom of the Hierarchy of Needs Pyramid. They sell their souls, their pens, their friends, and everything, and create Anima Farm. They pretend that they are modern humans, while they are modern pig or modern sheep. But unfortunately, many people don’t know these bastards and other bad guys. In these days, the US election farce and the US foolishness and shamelessness and many other shameful events need severe criticism and mockery. But before publishing severe criticism and mockery of the US and the West, that can cause misunderstanding, lets write about a film that can show you our motto and part of our philosophy of life. Nothing But the Truth (2008) is one of the best political and philosophical films, and can show you whether you know the bad guys or not. Iran’s state TV showed this film in 95min, while its runtime is about 105min. I give this film 8/10. This film that shows the roots of many serious problems in USA, was a victim of “American Censorship”. As the media report: “This film never got a theatrical release“. But what is this film that became a victim of “American Censorship”? Its a drama about freedom of the press, the judicial system and the corrupt system in the US. The film is about the tragedy of the freedom in the most free country of this shitty world. This film can pose many important ethical questions. In this film, a journalist, Rachel Armstrong (Kate Beckinsale), discovers a fellow soccer mom Doren (Vera Farmiga) is working for the CIA and is part of a US plot against a foreign country. Rachel’s article becomes front-page news, but the US government accuses her of treason, and says that Rachel is a threat to national security! They try to punish a journalist for telling the truth and revealing the secrets of an evil plot! Like the Mullah regime and other dictatorships, the US authorities use “National Security” as an excuse for censorship and suffocation. A special Federal prosecutor Dubois (Matt Dillon) and a grand jury want to know who her source is. In this film, everything has a symbolic meaning. Rachel can be an American that tries to tell the truth about the 2009 coup or the secret relations between the US and the Mullahs. In this film, many things can remind you of the Mullah regime. Judge Hall behaves like Mullahs or stooges, and Rechel is jailed for contempt of court!. Days become weeks, and then months, but Rachel still is in prison. The US corrupt system tries to destroy her life, and everybody betrays her, but she doesn’t surrender to the bad guys. The CIA assassinates Doren. Rachel is hopeless. Her husband, the journalists, the mass media and everybody betray her. Even her lawyer, a high profile attorney (Alan Alda), asks her to give up, but she just cares about the truth. Alda argues her case before the Supreme Court, but even the Supreme Court is part of the corrupt system. They decide against her.


I know that watching this film or seeing the true face of USA is really shocking and depressing for many Iranians. But in these days, Iranians are accepting the sad truths about the US, and Rachel’s story can show the roots of many problems in the West. Rachel spends one year in prison, because it’s what the CIA wants! Eventually, Judge Hall decides to release her after one year, but on the day she is released, they arrest her again! This kind of situation is all too familiar to Iranians & those who live under tyranny. Rachel loses her job, her family life, and everything. There is no hope. If she doesn’t make a deal with the CIA, she should spend 20 years in prison! And finally for the sake of her young son, Rachel gives up and stops fighting. It’s very tragic. This film has a very bad ending, but not because of this sad truth that Rachel finally gives up, but because the story of Rachel’s source is a stupid story. As film critics say: “The ending is absolute crap. Movie flows really well until the last 5 min! This movie was 90% really good and the remaining 10% killed it”. But this bad ending is not important. If you forget the last 5 min or the first 10 min, many parts of the film have serious thought-provoking messages. The film that is about the fundamental principles and the truth, is full of good dialog and good questions. In these years, many pseudo intellectuals talk about the relativism, and use it as an excuse for justifying the shameful behaviors. We have already written about this issue in “Alternative to Tribalism: Good Guys vs. Bad Guys” (check Archive). The bastards say: “The world and the people are not black and white. Everything is grey“. But it’s a big lie. Yah, many many things are grey, but it doesn’t mean that everything is grey. Yah, each person has his own whiteness and blackness, but those who have + 75% whiteness or blackness are not grey. Even those who are familiar with painting and mixing colors, are aware of this fact! In this film, Rachel and few others are good guys; Alda and many others are grey guys; but Dubois, Judge Hall, Ray (Rachel’s husband) and others belong to the spectrum of the bad guys. The badness of Dubois is not like the badness of Ray, but all of them belong to the tribe of the bad guys. They are those who create tyranny and corrupt system, or support it and strengthen it. They are like the Iranian baboons. Some say: “Though there have been numerous films made about truth and justice, only a few of them remain as good as ‘Nothing But the Truth’. This film is an important film”. It’s true, and maybe that’s why the American pigs censored and boycotted it. Even the title of the film, ‘Nothing But the Truth’, is very good. The title might sound clichéd but it fits. The title, as an old motto, is the most important thing for the real intellectuals. In fact, the most important difference between the real intellectuals and the pseudo intellectuals is that the real intellectuals only care about the truth. But the pseudo intellectuals care about power, politics, money, etc more than the truth. Most people don’t know why Noam Chomsky is a pseudo intellectual. Chomsky is not a real intellectual, because he cares about politics more than truth. Chomsky is a political activist that defends Chavez, Mullahs, and other dictators for political reasons. Chomsky and most lefty intellects are pseudo intellectuals because they care about many things but the truth. Chomsky and many lefties even are not good guys, because the real good guys care about the truth a lot. Anyway, Rachel is a reporter that risks everything to do the right thing, but unfortunately what she does is meaningless for many people in today’s West. I don’t know how many people in the US and the world see Rechel as an idiot, but their number is equal to the number of the Sheeple and the stupid bastards. The American idiots say: “Choices have consequences. Rachel had a choice. She fought, and they punished her!” Many Americans are really stupid. They are like Rachel’s husband (Roy). Rachel’s lawyer says to Roy: “If you think your wife felt like she had a choice in this, [you are a pig]”, and Rachel says to Roy: “You’re cheating on your wife, while she is fucking rotting in jail?”, but many Americans defend Roy, because they are like Roy. Some of them say: “I have sympathy for Roy. I feel she deserved every thing she got. She ruined her life and her husbands all for a stupid reason … I have sympathy for other characters who suffered the consequences of her stupid, selfish actions [!!]… They try to paint a picture of a martyr that you are to feel sorry for, but I can’t. She is willing to sacrifice her husband, her son and her freedom for what? for truth? she is idiot“. Can you believe it?! As the wise guys say: “It’s the true face of the American pigs, and that’s why the US has become the land of the pigs and the land of the bad guys. Many Americans are like their corrupt politicians”. In fact, Rachel’s husband is an idiot that becomes a stupid pig, but many Americans are like or worse than him, and it’s one of the greatest problems in USA and the West.


Unfortunately, even many open-minded people can’t understand the true meaning of Relativism and Bigotry. Sometimes they claim that something is an important principle, while it’s not; and sometimes they claim there is no principle or no value, and say: “you can’t find any ‘absolutely wrong’ or ‘absolutely right’ thing”. Politicians and other bad guys love these bullshit that can help them a lot. But it’s obvious that it’s not the true meaning of relativism. For instance, the following things are absolutely wrong: killing the innocent people, torturing the people, embezzling people money, being part of a corrupt system and defending it, being mercenary and kissing dictators’ ass, etc. You can’t work for the bad guys, and make love with the brutal dictators and then say: ‘Oh, it’s not absolutely wrong. We all are grey !’. Those who think in this way are those who make or strengthen the tyranny. They defend the brutal dictators in the name of relativism! Mussolini that was a journalist became a brutal dictator, because he was one of these bastards that pretend everything is relative. These bastards can bring Fascism to USA. The US government doesn’t want the truth to leak, and reporters are jailed for defending the truth. It’s absolutely wrong, but charlatans and ass-kissers defend it or justify it. Rachel’s story is like the true story of Bradley Manning, Assange, and others. Alda, Rachel’s lawyer, gives the keynote speech of the film in the Supreme Court, and says: “In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes, this court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the government to imprison the reporters… Stewart said: ‘As the years pass, the power of government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power, whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it and the people are the victims ‘. Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive … [if she revealed her source,] No source would ever speak to her and to her newspaper again, and then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers, we’ll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we’ll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a president has covered up crimes? Or if an army officer has condoned torture? We, as a nation, will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That’s for other countries. That’s for countries who fear their citizens. Some time ago, I told [Rachel] that I was there to represent her and not a principle. [But finally] I realized that with great people, there’s no difference between principle and the person“. It’s very important. Think about it. If you don’t know Alda, you think he is an Iranian that talks about Iran and the Mullah regime! It’s a very dangerous and meaningful similarity. Think about it, specially after the story of “Delisting the terrorist group (MEK) that is Marxist and Islamist”. This story that proved the US is the bad guy, is the most important non-secret story in the US history, as the Iranian 9/11 (2009 coup) is the most important secret story in the US history. As the wise Iranians say: “If the American people know the truth behind the Iranian 9/11, many things would change in USA, because the story of the Iranian 9/11 is the story of Control, cheating tactics and brainwashing tactics in the US. The story of the Iranian 9/11 is the story of Chomsky, the stupid lefts, and those wolves in sheep’s clothing that work for the CIA and the bad guys, and betray the American people in the name of defending them and helping them. They betray Americans in the name of alternative”. Some US film critics say: “this film was both exhilarating and frustrating, because so few films dare to tackle intelligent, provocative, socially relevant topics in a framework that doesnt condescend“. In fact, only a few Americans talk about the serious problems in the US, and it’s a great tragedy.


“Nothing But the Truth” talks about the old excuse of all brutal dictators: National Security and National Interests. The film tries to show the idiots that the first victim of this old excuse is the freedom and democracy. And it’s really true. Some say: “Nothing But the Truth practically shows how cruel and bad the government is in countries of the west which like to use word ‘democracy’ in their description, when actually they have many secret mercenaries in their Animal Farms. They completely ruin the life of a journalist, because she defends the truth”. And some add: “This story is true, moving and cruel, exactly the reflection of our reality and the world we are living in. You don’t get fed with all the nationalistic propaganda like in so many other American movies. Here, you see the real problems”. Some also add: “It’s like a film about WikiLeaks, Bradely Manning, and Assange. The governments do the evil things in the name of ‘homeland security’, and it’s the base of the tyranny”. And some Iranians say: “A US judge says to a journalist: ‘I want you to understand that if I should order you to reveal your source, that if you don’t do so, I’m gonna hold you in contempt of court, and that you will be jailed until you obey my order‘. But it’s exactly like what the Mullahs do. It’s the act of tyranny”. In fact, Judge Hall behaves like Mullahs. He says to Rachel: “You are defying my order[!], and I hold you in contempt of court”. And it’s exactly the language of tyranny. As some wise Iranians say: “Is Judge a dictator in the US ?! What the American judges say is exactly like the language of Mullahs. Why the judges in USA behave like dictators? Do they think they are master, and others are their slave? The judge should not have any special power”. It’s very important, but unfortunately many Westerners don’t know that ‘Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. Anyway, on the beginning of the film, we are informed that the story is fictitious, but as some say: “the film is based on the stories of Valerie Plame and Judith Miller. In the real life, Miller that worked for the New York Times, was imprisoned for not revealing the source which reported Plame (wife of a former US Ambassador) as a secret agent from the CIA”. Nothing But the Truth is not a stupid film. Rachel is not a hero. When everybody betrays her, instead of spending 20 years in prison, she makes a deal. She gives up for the sake of her son, and who can blame her? She is really alone, and her loneliness is very tragic. Those around her, from her employers and her people to her lawyer, her husband and others betray her. In fact, this film shows why some Americans call USA ‘a Nation of Sheep’, and why most Americans are the stupid sheep, and why U.S. corrupt system is not Democracy, but it’s “Sheepocracy” or “Corruptocracy”. The US system loves the public ignorance. The scene in which Rachel’s lawyer is asking her to give up and informs her that the public is no longer behind her, and thinks she is being selfish and a bad mother, is very moving. And in one of the best scenes, Rachel is interviewed by a Barbara Walters like journalist that pretends to be interested in their professional bond, tries to help the bad guys and betrays her. As some wise guys say: “The good guys who watches this film will find respect for Rachel. If you have no sympathy for her, it means that you are not a good guy”. And it reminds me of the story of traitors. The normal humans hate traitors. A traitor is a bad guy, but not because he betrays a special country or group, but because he betrays the truth, and loves telling lie and selling his soul.


It’s obvious that a well-informed guy is behind the film. As the media report: “The writer/ director Rod Lurie spent 13 years in the newspaper business. At age 18 he began attending U.S. Military Academy. Upon graduation in 1984, he spent 4 years serving in the army. He worked part-time as freelance journalist, writing film reviews. After fulfilling his obligation to the Army, he became a full-time film critic. Lurie’s best film, Nothing But the Truth, is a [victim of American censorship], and is currently in distribution hell, which means you might have to seek it out. But it’s worth the trouble. The film is important and shows part of the hidden facts in the US“. And some wise Americans add: “And that’s why they try to prevent the people from watching it. The truth is that both Republicans and Democrats are fucking the freedom and democracy in the US”. The film can show you many things about today’s USA. Rachel’s prison is like a Mullah prison. Some prisoners that are the government’s mercenaries, beat her to death. US system is badly corrupted. As some Americans say: “The US has less than 5% of the world’s population. But it has almost 25% of the world’s prison! They have turned the US into ‘a nation of jailers’! California now spends more on its prisons than it does on higher education!“. It’s obvious why ‘a nation of sheep’ becomes ‘a nation of jailers’. Lurie writes funny dialogue about US prisoners like this one: “That fat piece of shit over there keeps farting all night. About to turn my carjacking beef into a homicide if I stay over there“. And Lurie shows many serious problems in the US with simple dialogue. When a typical media whore tries to betray her, Rachel says: “Do you try to get a fellow journalist to betray her integrity? .. You’re never gonna have to worry about the government coming after you, because they don’t care how you found out where Paris had dinner last nigh”. As the wise Iranians say: “most American journalists are cheap and superficial idiots who get money and betray everything. Only a very few journalists are like Rachel. And that’s why the US has become the land of the bad guy”. As Rachel’s lawyer, Alda, says: “The weather has changed. In the old days, this would have been a lot easier to fight. The public would have called you a hero. [But now], no paper in this country has continued covering your story”. It’s the great tragedy of today’s USA. But it’s more than a mistake. As Alda says: “Sometimes a mistake is like invading Russia in winter”. In fact, sometimes a mistake is like returning to the dark ages and converting the US into a tyrannical, corrupt shithole. This film not only shows us the US corrupt system, but it shows us the US Sheeple and how they help the bad guys. At the beginning, the film can seem kinda dumb and pointless, but as the film goes forward and the story progresses you just like it more and more. The Mullahs changed some dialogue of the film, but seeing this film in Iran’s state TV was acceptable. The “bad guys” of this film are real bad guys, specially those stupid people that help the corrupt system and justify its evil acts in the name of national interests or personal interests. And It reminds me of the story of the Barbarians and “How the Barbarians Shaped Today’s World” and “How the former Barbarians are still barbarians”. We will write about this story, and also about the wise Iranians that talk about “the Western Barbarians” who still don’t allow us to have a better world. We should write about many things. For instance, about the old Persian poems, and why the wise Iranians read them and say to the stupid West: “In this ancient country, our Lions roared and passed – The barking of you, the little dogs, will pass too; The dust of those who had horses settled (passed) – The dust of your jackasses shall pass too; Your turn came to you, the barbarians, by way of noble men (Persians) – The time of your barbaric rule will pass too; The knight of annihilation who check mates the King – Will also capture you, the pawns , too”. We should write why Iranians say: “Are Americans Mongol ?!”, or why they talk about the British Barbarians and European Barbarians. In this website, we just care about the truth. And if you tell big lies and betray the truth and the humans, it’s not important that you are Iranian, American, European, Canadian, Asian, Arab, Jew, African, etc; we will tell the truth, and we will publish severe criticisms and mockery of you, your history and your pathetic pretence. In this website, our motto is: Nothing But the Truth. And I hope one day all humans care about the truth a lot.

Life, Human Suffering, Suicide, and Tony Scott

August 23, 2012

“Famed director Tony Scott jumped Off an L.A. bridge, and committed suicide on 19 August 2012. Witnesses described seeing Scott park his car on the Vincent Thomas Bridge, a 56-metre-high bridge overlooking Los Angeles harbor, and leaping to his death ‘without hesitation’ at about 12.30pm local time. Some said a suicide note was found in Scott’s car, which was parked on one of the eastbound lanes of the bridge. Tony Scott directed such films as ‘Top Gun’, ‘Spy Game’, and ‘Enemy of the State’. The 68-year-old Tony Scott was the younger brother of director Ridley Scott”, the media reported. And some added: “Tony Scott had inoperable brain cancer and killed himself to spare his family the pain of watching his slow death, sources close to him have revealed. He didnt have any money problems or family problems. He lived in Beverly Hills, and his wife, Donna, is a model and actress who had appeared in some of his films. Tony Scott met his wife Donna in 1994, after two unsuccessful marriages. She gave birth to twins Max and Frank in 2000. Scott loved action films, and his tragic death can be the last action scene of his action films. His tragic death comes just weeks after he was pictured looking pained as he left a Beverly Hills restaurant on July 23. Scott had been in hospital earlier this summer and told friends it was for a hip operation. But they knew he had previously kicked cancer and suspected it had come back”. The story of his cancer has not been confirmed yet. Some media also added: “A passenger in a vehicle that was crossing the bridge at the time, says: ‘He was on the roadway close to the fence looking around. He looked nervous. I thought it was some extreme sports guy. (Scott) paused a couple of seconds and then began to climb the fence … He put his foot on the top of the fence and paused again … and then he threw himself off‘”. In these days, Tony Scott’s suicide and many other bad news make many feel bad. So, lets write about the tragedy of life, the human suffering, suicide, and hope. “Life is Tragedy“, the wise guys say; and who can deny it? Life is not like a movie. Life is a real tragedy, or as Woody Allen says: “Life is divided into the horrible and the miserable”. Suicide is a very complicated subject. Some ask: “Is suicide a solution?” It’s hard to say yes, and it’s hard to say no! Humans have many fundamental questions about Life, Meaning of Life, Death, and many other things, that have remained unanswered. Religion, delusion, self-deception, and other tricks can bring hope, or can offer some hope, that is certainly good, but they provide no real answers. “Life is Tragedy“, and a little self-deception can be good or acceptable, but with excessive self-deception, life just becomes a great tragedy. Almost all humans have problem with life and “Meaning of Life”, and when they become deeply depressed, they think about suicide. Many people, specially the depressed people, ask: “Why we have to keep on breathing?” It’s a very serious question, and everybody tries to find his/her own answer, but I think one of the best answers is what you can see in Cast Away (2000), a famous film directed by Robert Zemeckis and starring Tom Hanks: “You just have to keep on breathing because tomorrow the sun will rise and who knows what the tide will bring“. It’s the best shortest answer that I’ve heard.


Cast Away is a very good film, and I think it has one of the best dialog in the history of cinema, specially when Chuck Noland (Tom Hanks) talk about life and hope. Let’s take a look at some excerpts from Chuck’s dialog: “I was going to die there [on that island], totally alone. The only choice I had, the only thing I could control was when, and how and where it [my death] was going to happen. So, I made a rope and I went up to the summit, to hang myself. I had to test it; you know me. And the weight of the log, snapped the limb of the tree, so I couldn’t even kill myself the way I wanted to. I had power over ‘nothing’. And that’s when this feeling came over me like a warm blanket. I knew, somehow that I had to stay alive. I had to keep breathing. Even though there was no reason to hope. And all my logic said that I would never see this place again. So that’s what I did. I stayed alive. I kept breathing. And one day, my logic was proven all wrong because the tide came in, and gave me a sail. And now, here I am. I’m back … Now, I’ve lost her. I’m so sad … But I know what I have to do now. I got to keep breathing. Because tomorrow, the sun will rise, and who knows what the tide could bring?“. It’s one of the best dialog in the history of cinema, and it’s one of the best and shortest dialog about the human life and hope. Many have seen Cast Away (2000). Chuck is one of the typical American businessmen who want to be ‘successful’ and don’t want to be ‘loser’. And when he is cast away on a small island, he changes his views about life, “success”, “losers”, “hope”, etc. But all of us can be a Chuck. You don’t need ‘being cast away on a remote island’ for understanding many things. The human suffering, the mental pains, or the human life that is full of horrible tragedies, can show you many things. When a bad thing happen to your loved ones or yourself, you can be a Chuck. When you lose your hopes or part of your hopes, or when you are too upset or get depressed, you can be a Chuck. And it’s when you can think or behave like Chuck. And it’s when you can tell yourself: “Let’s keep breathing. who knows what the tide will bring tomorrow“. Only a very few people are satisfied with their life, as only a very few people have a few problems with Life, Illness, the Old Age, etc. Most people have many serious problems in this shitty world, and suffer from the same pains and the same tragedies. Most people have many serious problems with the basic needs and the basic questions. In the US, Europe, and other parts of the world, depression, mental disorders, poverty, drug addiction, irresponsible parents, cold-blooded people that are indifferent to others, suicide and other horrible problems are still among the serious social problems. But you should not forget that there’s nothing worse than living in a shithole like Iran under the Mullah regime, that in which the Mullahs and the West cause people many unique horrible problems. Our situation in Iran under the Mullah regime is like or worse than Chuck’s situation on that remote island. When Chuck said: “I don’t want to stay here and die on this shithole island spending the rest of my life talking …“, you could think that the writer has copied this from what some Iranians say in Iran. In fact, Iranians can understand Chuck well. Of course other people can understand him as well, if they can live with open eye and open mind.


“Tony Scott was rich, and could satisfy most of his needs. We can’t understand why he and other rich people commit suicide”, some say. But if they know about the hierarchy of needs, or the existential issues, they can understand why even the super rich people get depressed or commit suicide. And that’s why some wise guys say: “If you solved all the political problems in the world, and solved all the relationship problems, and nobody was starving and everyone was living in peace and all of that, we would still have existential issues”. Money, fame, and even peace, freedom, democracy, justice, good family, good society, and many other good things don’t solve all human problems; these good things are good tools for solving problems, and just lack of them create many many horrible problems. In fact, these good things and many of our needs are Deficiency Needs, that means ‘only the lack or shortage of them create very serious problems’. We have written about these issues in “Maslows Hierarchy of Needs” and “Maslow Hierarchy of Needs and Critics” (check Archive). Having good society or good family is very important, but it doesn’t solve all human problems. Yah, it can be very depressing, but it also can be a good news for all of us, specially those who live under a brutal dictatorship. All of us live in a bad society, with corrupt politicians, corrupt systems, and the bad guys that try to hurt us. But when you know even if you live in a good society, you still can have many problems, it can help to ease your pains. It can show you that you need “real solutions”. It can show you that if you try to explore and reach your full human potential, and become one of the self actualized people, you not only feel more alive, happier, self-sufficient, more aware of truth, justice, harmony, goodness, and so on, but you have more chance to find a solution to the fundamental problems or the existential issues. Of course when you live in a shithole like Iran under the Mullah regime, it’s hard to become a self actualized, but it’s not impossible. In such shitholes, you can feel the true meaning of tragedy, pain, or the human suffering. As you know, ‘humans generally prefer a safe, orderly, predictable, organized world, which they can count on, and in which unexpected, unmanageable or other dangerous things do not happen, and in which, in any case, they have powerful supporters who protect and shield them from harm’. A good society should make its members feel safe enough from criminals, and other bad guys and bad things. But when you live in a shithole like Iran under the Mullah regime, the brutal puppet regime has just one goal: the people should not feel safe or good. In such shitholes, most people are unsatisfied, because their safety needs, their basic needs, and their human needs are largely unsatisfied. In the recent years, when you see the Iranian people, most of them are unhappy and unsatisfied. They are not satisfied with many things, including the stupid service they received. In Iran, when you go to a hospital or a court building, you can see the depth of the tragedy, and how the world’s most corrupt regime can create a corrupt system and a corrupt society. Recently, I was forced to go to a hospital for a loved one. The corrupt system or the unkind health care workers can really piss you off. When you see even many health care workers have become greedy businessmen or cold-blooded jerks, it’s really tragic. Of course it’s so obvious that those who have many unsatisfied basic needs and safety needs, become selfish, nervous, and indifferent to others. A brutal corrupt system can create many greedy and selfish people. But in Iran, you still can see hopeful things. After the recent earthquakes in Iran, the Iranian people that don’t trust Mullahs and the Mullah regime, tried to help the victims directly. The Iranian people don’t trust Mullahs, but they tried to trust athletes and other public figures, and donated more than $50 million to the victims. Only two athletes could collect more than $5 million donations. And it proves that Mullahs, their brutal puppet regime and their corrupt system are the main problem, not people. It clearly proves that the Iranian people just need trustworthy figures or trustworthy alternative for getting rid of the Western puppets and the big shithole that has been created by them. In fact, even in this shithole, people can keep breathing and think that “tomorrow the sun will rise, and who knows what the tide will bring”. Tony Scott, Chuck, and Iranians had much in common.


The Iranian people live in a very difficult and tragic situation. Here, life is more meaningless than many other places. A very brutal puppet regime and puppets of the West have created a big shithole here. The crooks, the killers, the mercenaries, the jerks, and the meanest and stupidest people, that the stupid West and the stupid lefts love them and support them, create and rule this shithole and try to make our life hell. But when even in this shithole, some people can tell themselves: ‘lets keep on breathing, who knows what the tide can bring”, or when even some one like Stephen Hawking, that have lived with the prospect of an imminent death for the last 50 years, says: ‘Im not afraid of death, but Im in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first’, it can mean that all humans in all around the world, can try to keep on breathing, and can tell themselves: ‘Who knows what the tide will bring. Maybe tomorrow the tide gives us … ‘. Of course as the witty Iranians say: ‘In this shithole, the tide often gives us shit and shitty things’. But even in the worst possible conditions, no one knows what the tide will bring, and it’s not a lie; It’s the meaning of ‘hope’. I can understand Tony Scoot. No one can blame him. But some wise guys say: “Yah, suicide can be a solution; but why are you in such a hurry to die? Sooner or later, you die. It’s inevitable. So, don’t hurry to die”. And some wise guys add: “Many wise guys think about suicide. They have some plans for suicide. They don’t care about death, but they have so much that they prefer to do first”. And some wise guys say: “Sometimes [you are like Chuck, and] you even can’t kill yourself the way you want to. You think you have power over nothing. But you have power over many things. You can choose your thoughts, and your views about the world, yourself, your life, etc”. Many things annoy humans, and “money” or “fame” can’t solve many problems. As some say: “Tony Scott was a British-born film director and producer. He was the youngest of three brothers. As a result of his father’s career in the British military, his family moved around a lot. Their mother loved the going to the movies and instilled a love of cinema in her children. He and his brothers were rich and well-known. They had everything”. But the human suffering and the tragedy of life is not just a physical issue. It’s a mental pain. Many try to use self-deception methods, and many can’t deceive themselves with such things. But you can be in no hurry to die, and can tell yourself: ‘Who knows what the tide will bring. Maybe tomorrow the tide brings … ‘. We all can get rid of our stupid needs. As Maslow said: “The healthy, normal, fortunate man has no s-e-x needs or hunger needs, or needs for safety, or for love, or for prestige, or self-esteem, except in stray moments of quickly passing threat”. Many people envy others, and it’s really stupid. When you know the human needs, the human suffering, and the tragedy of life, you don’t envy others, and don’t hurt yourself by your stupidities. When you see that many Iranians say: ‘I envy Americans or Canadians, they seem so happy there’, or when you see that many Americans, Canadians, Europeans, etc say: ‘We are not happy. We have many serious problems here” or ‘I really envy the rich men, they seem so happy’, and when you see what the rich and well-known figures say or do, you can see the main issues. As the wise guys say: ‘Life is tragic, but sometimes you can see life as a fight against ‘meaningless life’, and you can fight to the last drop of blood, or the last drop of hope, or the last drop of money. Sometimes you are so tired of everything, and suicide seems like a good solution, but it’s better you don’t hurry to die. Maybe when you are so tired of life, you can think about Chuck and what he said: ‘tomorrow, the sun will rise, and who knows what the tide will bring in'”.

Irene Zazians: Iranian Actress in 1950s and 1970s

July 30, 2012

Irene Zazians, Iran’s Elizabeth Taylor, died at age 85. She started as an actor in 1948, and became a super star in the 1950s. After the Islamic revolution, the Mullahs banned her from participating in any artistic or outdoor activities. Irene had no children. She was an anti-Mullah actress”, the media reported. Irene’s death can remind us of the tragedy of human life and many other shitty things in this shitty world, but let’s forget these tragic facts. Irene and her life can show many things about the Iranian society in the 20th century, including the true meaning of being Iranian and living in Iran. Irene Zazians, better known as Irene, was an Iranian Christian, or Armenian. As the people media report: “When Russia attacked Persia and occupied today’s Armenia in the 19th century, and when the Ottoman Turks started to massacre Armenians in the early 20th century, many Armenians immigrated to Persia, their ancient homeland, and one of these Armenians was Irene’s father (the Caucasus that Russia occupied it in the 19th century, was part of Persia since thousands years go). Irene was born in 1927. She was a theater actress, and started her work in the Sadi Theater in Tehran”. They also add: “Irene was a victim of censorship and dictatorship in both the Pahlavi regime and the Mullah regime. When the Pahlavi regime slapped a ban on the Sadi Theater in 1950, Irene was among those rare artists who protested against this shameful ban. But the Pahlavi regime that was a brutal puppet dictatorship, hated the intellects and the wise artists, and only cared about ‘Abgushti’ (cheap and stupid) works, artists, intellects, etc. The Sadi Theater and almost all serious theater groups could not continue their works after the 1953 coup, when the US aided Pahlavi II in becoming a brutal puppet dictator, like his stupid father”.


“In 1957, Irene started her work in cinema. In 1958, she was the first Iranian actress that worn Bikini in an Iranian film, “Paradise Messenger”. Irene said: ‘At that time, the Italian films were so popular in Iran, and the Iranian people loved to see Sofia Loren and other women who wore Bikini in the Italian films. But our film became so popular and people loved it, even more than the Italian films’. It’s funny to know that after several months, the Pahlavi regime decided to censor this film, and seized it. Irene Zazians was a famous film star in the 1950s and the 1970s. But in the 1960s, for more than 5 years she didn’t appear in any films, partly because Iranian films had become ‘Abgushti’ (cheap and stupid), and censorship was so severe”, the people media add. Many don’t know when most of European women and American women were so conservative and didn’t wear Bikini, a group of Iranian women wore Bikini. As the media report: “Bikini, or Bikini Atoll, is an island in the Pacific Ocean where the US performed nuclear weapons tests from 1946 until the 1960s. In 1946, four days after the first atomic test on the Bikini atoll, a French fashion designer introduced a two-piece swimsuit. The coincidence of earthshaking events attached the name ‘Bikini’ to the suit, perhaps to suggest its explosive effect on the fashion world”. But as the people media add: “In the 1940s and the 1950s, most of Western women were still so conservative and traditionalist. And when the Iranian celebrities started to wear Bikini, most of American women and European women didn’t wear Bikini. At that time, only a few western women wore Bikini”.


“After the Islamic revolution, and until her death, Irene didn’t sell her soul. When most of Iranian film stars [that were stupid and Khayemal (ass-kisser)] kissed the Mullah’s ass and could continue their stupid artistic works in Iran under the Mullah regime, Irene refused to kiss the Mullah’s ass. The Mullahs and Islamists that are Arabs, pro-Arabs, and anti-Iran, ruined her life, as they ruined Iran”, the people media add. As Irene’s friends say, Irene used to call the Mullahs and the Islamists ‘the Motherfucker’, and she had got depressed in the recent years. In fact, Irene looked like today’s Iranians, not the older generations of Iranians. In the post-2009 era, most of Iranians feel sad, lonely, or depressed, and Irene was one of them. The story of these years is “Hekayat-e MatharGhabegi” (the story of The Motherfucker) that we should write more about it later. In “Hekayat-e MatharGhabegi”, the Mullahs and the Islamists that most of Iranians truly see them as British agents, Arabs, or anti-Iran forces, are not the only bad guys or the only motherfucker. As the wise Iranians say: “the US, the West, the lefts, the Iranian baboons, the British bastards, the Arab pigs, and other jerks, that helped the Mullah regime, are like the Mullahs or even worse than them”. In “Hekayat-e MatharGhabegi”, that is the story of our time, the idiots and the Khayemal (ass-kisser) help the Mullahs, the West, and other bad guys, and betray the ordinary people. It’s a new version of an old story. In in her own time, Irene and other modern Iranians were in the minority in Iran, and became a victim of the Western betrayals and puppets of the West (Pahlavists and Islamists) in 1953, 1979, etc. But it’s really tragic that the modern Iranians are still victim of the Western betrayals and puppets of the West (Mullahs, Pahlavists, and other Iranian baboons), while they are in the majority in Iran today.


“Irene Zazians, Nosrat Karimi, and a few other artists were anti-Mullahs. Irene played a major role in Nosrat Karimi’s Mohallel (1971) that was a film about the Arab traditions, and how Mullahs and Islamists work as pimp. In 1971, the Mullah Motahari, that was Khomeini’s right hand man, wrote an article and denounced this film, and the Pahlavi regime published his article in the state-owned newspaper (Keyhan). Then very soon, just after three days, the Shah and the Pahlavi regime slapped a ban on this film. In fact, both the Mullahs and the Pahlavi regime worked together to censor films, books, and other intellectual works. Both of these two evil forces just loved cheap and stupid works”, the people media add. In fact, both the Mullahs and the Pahlavi regime that were puppets of the West, and their mission was ‘keeping Iran backward’, worked together and tried to impose censorship and dictatorship on Iranians. As the wise Iranians say: “these two evil forces, i.e. Mullahs (Islamists) and Monarchists (Pahlavists), that are puppets of the West, still work together and try to accomplish their mission”. In these days, the stupid Mullahs have started a funny game, that as many Iranians say: “It clearly proves that the Mullahs are British agents and their mission is ‘destroying Iran and keeping Iran backward'”. After implementing the IMF plan, destroying Iran’s economy, and helping the Western sanctions, the Mullahs have recently started to talk about ‘abolishing family planning policies’ and ‘destroying birth-control programs’, amid the Western sanctions and the economic crises!


“Irene had no children, but most of Iranians were not like her. “After the 1979 revolution, the Mullahs encouraged a baby boom and tried to keep Iran backward. But that baby boom didn’t help the Mullahs and their Western employers. In the recent days, the Western media angrily reported: ‘Iran has become a very urbanised society with a largely educated people’. The West is so angry that Iranians have become modern, and can build a modern and strong country soon. And that’s why the Mullahs, that are puppets of the West, try to help the West again. In these days, the Mullahs, that have not forgotten their mission, send green signal to the West, by encouraging a new baby boom amid the economic disasters! They declare: ‘Family planning programs have been cut from the budget. Get busy and have babies’ ! But the stupid Mullahs and their Western employers don’t know how Iran has changed, and how Iranians hate them”, the people media add. In the 1950s or the 1970s, when Irene was a film star, most of Iranians were illiterate and lived in the rural areas. But now the vast majority of Iranians are well-educated and live in the urban areas. And that’s why both the Mullahs and the West can’t not fool people as before. “In 2009, and after the 2009 coup, the Mullahs tried to make the West happy, and declared that for each new baby they give $1000, and then pay $100 every year. But no one gave a damn shit about them, because Iranians have become aware. And it makes the West and puppets of the West so angry”, the wise Iranians say. Irene can show us the differences between the 2010s and the 1970s. When she was a famous film star, only a few Iranians were as modern as their western counterparts, but now, today’s Iranians at least are as modern as their Western counterparts.


The Iranian society has changed a lot, and now many can understand some one like Irene Zazians well. Iran has had the largest and fastest drop in fertility ever recorded- from about 6.5 births per woman to less than 1.5 today. And it helped to usher in social changes. With smaller families, parents could invest more in their children’s education. Women became better educated, and their influence grew. Female university students now outnumber males 65% to 35%. In fact, Iran has changed a lot, and Iranians have become modern people. Now, most of Iranians hate Mullahs and see them as non-Iranian or British agent, and no one gives a shit about Mullahs. Now, the West and puppets of the West can’t fool Iranians as before, and it’s a very big change. Now, many Iranians say: “This Jewish Spy (Ahmadinejad), the Arab pigs and the British agents (Mullahs) desperately try to serve the West’s interests and keep Iran backward. But nothing can help the Mullahs and the West. The last baby boom not only didn’t help them, but badly f-u-c-ked the Mullahs and the Islamists in Iran”. The wise Iranians add: “The Mullahs and their Western employers want to convert Iran into a new Pakistan or Afghanistan. But these idiots don’t know that Iran’s strong point is its people and its youth, who are modern and anti-Islamists. The last baby boom in the 1980s created today’s Iranians, i.e. more than 75% of Iranians that are young and modern, and hate Mullahs and puppets of the West. They created the 1997 movement and the 2009 revolt. And they will put an end to the Mullah regime and the Monarchy system in the near future”. Now, Iran has not just one Irene or few modern people. Now, most of Iranian men and women are as modern as Irene Zazians, and many of them are wiser, more educated, and more modern than Irene. The Mullahs and other puppets of the West have reached the end of the line.

True Face: Lobbyists and Lobbying Industry in USA

July 8, 2012

Some Americans call the US “the United States of Money and Corruption”. But many people don’t know why. They also don’t know why bad guys, including Mullahs, Mullah Mafia, Iranian Monarchists, terrorists, and other evil forces can make love with the US officials on American soil, while the ordinary people should be victims of the stupid sanctions or the stupid politics. As we said before, many Iranians have started to think about the roots of problems, and in a series of articles (True Face) we try to write about these roots or those problems that the media whores and the intellectual mercenaries try to hide them or tell big lies about them. Unfortunately, bad guys that are paid by the West and/ or the Mullahs, tell big lies about Iran and the West, and try to fool people. For instance, they say: “Iranians are corrupt, stupid, or religious people, but Westerners are not”. In the Western media and the Iranian baboons’ media (Balatarin, Roozonline, etc), the Iranian mercenaries and their Western employers openly and shamelessly tell big lies, and pretend that many problems are “special Iranian problems”, while we know that Westerners suffer from a bigger version of these problems. The worthless mercenaries and their Western employers try to make Iranians feel that all Westerners are intellectuals. Unfortunately, many don’t know the main problems of the US and the West. In these days, when many search engines censor us and boycott us, let’s forget the issue of search engines and censorship for a while, and instead, let’s take a look at a very serious problem: ‘Lobbyists and lobbying industry in the US’. “Casino Jack and the United States of Money (2010) “, is a documentary film by Alex Gibney. This film, that Iran’s state TV has shown it, is about Jack Abramoff and lobbyists and lobbying industry in the US. Compared to Alex Gibney’s previous films, specially “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room” -that Iran’s state TV showed it, too- “The United States of Money” is not a good film, and has many weak points. But the subject of “The United States of Money” is very important, and about 30% of the film is good and can show you many things about a very important problem in the US, i.e. lobbyists and lobbying industry. Gibney won the Academy Award (Oscar) for “TAXI TO THE DARK SIDE (2007)”, and became a famous filmmaker who talks about serious problems in the US. In “Enron: …”, that is about Enron’s scandal and corrupt brokers in U.S. system, and in “the United States of Money” Gibney shows us that “brokers” and “Lobbyists” are among the most important problems in the US. In Iran, brokers are known as “Dalal”, and “Lobbyists” as “Kar Chagh Kon”, and Iranians know how these bastards can corrupt a system and everything, but many Iranians and non-Iranians don’t know that ‘brokers’ and ‘lobbyists’ are very serious problems in the US and the West. The media whores and intellectual mercenaries pretend that corrupt people and corrupt systems belong to the East or the South, not the West or the North. They pretend that the West or the US is the land of freedom and democracy, and is free from corruption, censorship, and other serious problems. They show us the fantasy world of Hollywood, while the real world is very tragic and disappointing. Unfortunately, corrupt people and corrupt systems are among serious problems in the US and the West. It’s hard to believe, but today’s USA is as corrupt as Iran under the Mullah regime. It’s what we saw it in the past three years, and it’s what the wise Americans, including Alex Gibney, can show it to you. When the Iranian people became aware that, for instance, the American companies aided the Mullahs in killing and torturing Iranians, or Obama wrote secret love letters to Khamenei, or the Mullah TV started to work in Washington, or Mullah crooks and Mullah terrorists went to the US and Canada, or the US media – including the VOA- help and support the Mullah regime and Mullah Mafia, or the US media and the US politicians make love with Pahlavists (monarchist) and Rajavisits (terrorists), they were shocked and could not believe it. But now, when they see how the US politicians support terrorists, Islamists, and monarchists openly and shamelessly, and when they read: “The US State Dept. official told the Monitor: Your speech agent calls, and says you get $20,000 to speak for 20 minutes. They will send a private jet, you get $25,000 more when you are done, and they will send a team to brief you on what to say [and how to support bad guys]'”, they just say: “Wow, American politicians are like Mullahs, and that’s why they love Mullahs. But why the US is badly corrupted? Why American officials are as corrupt as the Mullahs? Why American public figures are worthless mercenaries?” If you want to find the answer, you should study about the story of “brokers” and “Lobbyists” in the US.


“The United States of Money is about corruption in U.S. system. It clearly shows the tight connections between lobbyists and the administration and politicians. It talks about systematic corruption, not ‘a few bad apples’ or a conspiracy. It talks about a serious problem that the American people let it happen by closing their eyes and their minds“, some say. In today’s world, even kids know that “power corrupts” and “money corrupts”. But in the US, the rich people are sick people, and they still can buy and sell everything, including justice, freedom and democracy. “In the US and the West, lobbyists bribe or buy politicians, including members of Congress. “‘Lobbying’ term comes from the gathering of Members of Parliament and peers in the hallways (or lobbies) of Houses of Parliament before and after parliamentary debates. Some say: ‘A ‘lobbyist’ is a person who tries to influence politicians or legislation on behalf of a special interest or a member of a lobby’. But how a lobbyist influence politicians? by talking about morality or civic duty ?!! or by money, by bribing, and by corrupting ?! the answer is clear”, some add. Lobbying industry in the US is a highly controversial phenomenon, often seen in a negative light by the American public. But unfortunately, the American people don’t protest against it seriously. They just follow the stupid lefts like sheep. Some wise Americans say: “Unfortunately, lobbying happens at every level of government, including federal, state, county, municipal, and even local governments. The number of lobbyists in Washington is more than 20,000. Many lobbyists work in lobbying firms, and are part of multi-billion dollar lobbying industry in the US. They sell and buy politicians and their decisions. If a big corporation wishes to change public policy, or to influence legislation, it should pay lobbyists and they use their lobbying tactics – including bribery, gifts, donation, etc – to serve their employer’s interests”. It’s really unbelievable. I know that many can’t believe this degree of corruption in the US. It’s really unbelievable that they can sell and buy U.S. politicians openly and shamelessly. Some Americans say: “Lobbyists use ‘outside lobbying’, too; that means Lobbyists try to manipulate public opinion. Activities for these purposes include trying to use the mass media, reporters and editors, encouraging them to write editorials and cover stories to deceive or influence public opinion. They bombard the public with ‘half-truths, lies, distortion, scare tactics, misinformation’, etc”. And it’s the root of many serious problems in today’s USA. In fact, when lobbyists can buy and sell everything, including politicians, journalists, media, intellects, and all public figures, it’s so obvious that Mullahs and terrorists can make love with Obama and U.S. officials, and it’s so obvious why and how Obama and American companies aided the Mullahs in killing and torturing tens of thousands of Iranians in 2009. As the wise Iranians say: “when the stupid donkey (Chomsky) is their top intellectual, and when many Americans are so stupid and live like sheep, it’s so obvious that the US should be a Corruptocracy, not a Democracy. Arabs, Jews, terrorists, Iranian bastards, and even Mullahs are part of U.S. Corruptocracy”. Some Americans say:” By 2011, one estimate of overall lobbying spending nationally was $30+ billion dollars”. It’s really horrible. And it’s so obvious that in this corrupt system, the savage Mullahs, the Mullah TV, the Mullah Mafia, the Mullah Gestapo, the Iranian baboons and other evil forces can make love with the corrupt Americans and can create a coup like the 2009 coup. Unfortunately, in the United States of Money and Corruption, you can buy and sell everything, including humanity, democracy, and human values. Recently, the LA Times reported: “You’d be shocked by how easily agents from the Mullah Gestapo and the Mullah Revolutionary Guard come and go inside the US every day”. But funny Iranians say: “In 2009, most of Iranians were shocked, too. But now, they know why and how the Americans aided the Mullahs in killing and torturing Iranians. In U.S. corrupt system, that the worthless mercenaries have an industry for themselves, and bribery and corruption is legal, nothing can shock you. In this corrupt system everything is possible. The US is the land of Corruption, not Democracy. The US is a paradise for mercenaries, crooks, thieves, and bad guys”.


“The United States of Money” is a film about Jack Abramoff (above right picture + below picture) and his great scandal. Abramoff was a great lobbyist, and a small part of lobbying industry in the US that really seems like Mafia movies. As the mass media reported: “Abramoff was convicted of fraud, conspiracy, and tax evasion in 2006, and of trading expensive gifts, meals and sports trips in exchange for political favors”. But the mass media’s reports about Abramoff seem like lobbyists’ tactics. “Abramoff was not a gangster, or a bad apple. He was a normal member of U.S. corrupt system. Most of lobbyists are like Abramoof, or even worse than him”, some Americans say. It’s funny to know that the story of Abramoff and US lobbyists are related to the story of Mullah Mafia and Iranian baboons in the US. “Abramoff’s corruption led to his conviction and to 20 persons either pleading guilty or being found guilty, including White House officials David Safavian and U.S. Representative Bob Ney”, the media reported. David Safavian or Hussein Safavian is an Iranian !, and as some say: “He is one of the Iranian bastards in the US. He was a top procurement official in the Bush administration. He is a longtime friend of Abramoff. In the 1990s, Safavian was a registered lobbyist for some foreign governments. In 1997, Safavian and Grover Norquist founded a lobbying firm, the Merritt Group, which was renamed Janus-Merritt Strategies. In November 2003, President Bush announced Safavian’s nomination to be the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, where he set purchasing policy for the entire government”. Many Iranians, including us, know nothing about David Safavian, but it’s very funny that Iranian baboons are part of lobbying industry in the US. The story of Abramoff and lobbyists has a key figure that Iranians should know him: Bob Ney (above left picture). Many believe Ney is a key figure of Mullah Mafia in the US. The US media reported: “In the late 1970s, Bob Ney went to Iran to teach English [!] and learn Persian language [!] And now he is the only member of Congress fluent in Persian [!!]“. It’s very funny, it’s it?! Some say: “Bob Ney was a CIA agent, not a teacher”. In fact, Bon Ney is either a CIA agent or a language-lover ! But the story of Bon Ney is very funny. The media reported: “As a Republican, Bob Ney represented Ohio in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 until 2006, when he resigned. In 1980, at the age of 26, Ney became a representative of the Ohio House of Representatives. In 1983, he went to Saudi Arabia and managed a home security company in Saudi Arabia [!]. He was appointed to the Ohio Senate in 1984″. It’s really hard to believe that Bon Ney is a language-lover ! Anyway, the media added: “Ney personally lobbied the then Secretary of State Colin Powell to relax U.S. sanctions on the Mullah regime. Bob Ney is the architect of the Washington-based lobbying enterprise for the Mullah regime, The National Iranian-American Council (NIAC). Trita Parsi was working as a Congressional aid in Bob Neys office in Washington on a temporary visa. Trita Parsi was subsequently appointed president of NIAC”. In fact, the story of Trita Parsi, Bob Ney, the CIA, Mullah Mafia, Obama, the Hunffington Post, the American lefts, Noam Chomsky, and many other things that we have already written about them (check Archive), can show you why and how the US helped the Mullahs. The media added: “Bon Ney accepted lavish gifts of travel, meals, entertainment and campaign contributions in exchange for giving congressional contracts to Abramoff’s clients and inserted comments into the Congressional Record on Abramoff’s behalf“. But do you know what happened to Bab Ney ? The media reported: “Bob Ney was sentenced to 30 months in prison. He was released in August 2008 after serving 17 months“. It’s really shocking and embarrassing. “The US is a paradise for crooks, thieves, corrupt politicians, media whores, mercenaries, and other bad guys. It’s the American Dream. And that’s why Mullah crooks, thieves, terrorists, killers and rapists can freely live in the US and Canada”, funny Iranians say. Bob Ney and his fate is not an exception. “As of December 2010 Jack Abramoff has completed his prison sentence, and now he is free !“, the media reported. Funny Iranians say: “The US is a bad joke. If Shahram Jazayeri, Khavari, Amir Khosravie, and other Mullah crooks lived in the US, they were sentenced to a few months in prison, and then they were released ! It’s the American Democracy: All people are equal, but crooks, thieves, and bad guys are more equal ! In US corrupt system, even Bin Laden, Mullahs, and Hitler can be released after a few years. In fact, the US and Canada is a paradise for bad guys. In North America, only crooks, thieves, and bad guys live in Paradise, not wise guys, ordinary people, and normal creatures. And it’s the true meaning of American Dream. Americans love great crooks and great criminals; the greater, the better”.


I know that the truth about the US can disappoint and upset many people, at least in Iran, and it’s quite understandable. When you live in the big prison (Iran), and when your basic rights and your basic freedoms are denied by puppets of the West, and when a brutal puppet regime and many horrible problems hurt you, it’s hard to see that even the free world and the US is full of shit. It can be very depressing. But you can’t deny the truth and how the outside world -especially politicians, media and public figures- hurt and betray people. If Iranians and other nations want to find a good solution for their horrible problems, they should know global problems and general problems. They should know why and how the outside world, bad guys and enemies of a better world betray them. Today’s Iranians can solve many problems in both Iran and today’s world. When you know that today’s world is really full of shit, and many problems are global problems, then you can find better solutions, and your solutions can become global solutions. We have already written about Direct Democracy and about Politics, Power, People, Conflicts, and Change. The US system just confirms that politicians and representative democracy are full of shit. Corruption and “Inequity of access to the decision-making process” are very big problems in today’s democracies. Individuals can not afford to lobby, and bad guys and corporations with “deeper pockets” can easily buy and sell politicians and democracy. It’s so obvious that Lobbying is not ‘debate and discussion’. Lobbying is corruption and secret deals behind closed doors. But democracy needs public and open ‘debate and discussion’, not lobbying and lobbyists. As we said before, people don’t need any representative in today’s world. They can be representative of themselves in the age of Internet. Direct Democracy and saying goodbye to politicians can solve many problems, including the problem of lobbying and lobbyists, that is a very serious problem in the West. As the media reported: “The situation in the UK is worse than the US. In the UK, many recent MPs and in particular Ministers are recruited by lobby firms and lobbyists “. It’s really horrible. “In fact, Mullahs and British politicians are alike, and that’s why they love each others”, funny Iranians say. Lobbying is a synonym for “bribery and corruption”, but media whores say: “Lobbying is equal to petition [!]”. It’s so obvious that the right to petition is one thing, and lobbying and bribing politicians is another thing. The intellectual mercenaries say: “The practice of lobbying in order to influence political decisions is a legitimate and necessary part of the democratic process”. But they don’t say “how they influence politicians and political decisions”. Bribing politicians, secret deals, and buying and selling politicians and their decisions behind close doors is a horrible and necessary part of corruption and the despotic process. Democracy needs public and open ‘debate and discussion’, not lobbying and lobbyists. Both the US and Europe are badly corrupted. “Currently around 15,000 Brussels-based lobbyists seek to influence the EUs legislative process”, the media reported. It’s so obvious who created the current horrible economic crisis in the West. I can recommend you all to watch Alex Gibney’s films. “The United States of Money” is not a bad film and can show you many things. This film is about 120 min, but Mullahs showed it in about 80 min and censored Casino-related contents. Alex Gibney’s “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room” is a better film. These two films can show you the roots of many serious problems in the US. These films show that the s-e-x slaves, gambling profits, murder, bribery, extortion, financial corruption, mafia, religious fundamentalism, war game, etc are part of the dirty world of lobbyists. The American media report: “‘The United States of Money’ shows how a lobbyists (Abramoff) used fundamentalism, bribery, extortion tactics, murder, etc. Jack Abramoff was born in 1959, in New Jersey and into a Jewish family. In 1986, Reagan appointed Abramoff as a member of the US Holocaust Memorial Council. Abramoff spent 10 years in Hollywood. Rabbi Daniel Lapin, introduced Abramoff to Congressman Tom DeLay at a Washington DC dinner shortly after the Republican takeover of Congress in 1994. Then Abramoff became a registered lobbyist for more than 50 clients. Abramoff and lobbyists help inordinate socioeconomic power that are corrupting the law (twisting it away from fairness) in order to serve their own interests. They bribe politicians, including members of Congress. But they can escape justice. Jack Abramoff only served four years before being released in 2010 . After his release from prison, he wrote the book Capitol Punishment: The Hard Truth About Corruption From America’s Most Notorious Lobbyist, which was published in November 2011. The 300-page memoir is an account of his life in Washington as a lobbyist”. It’s really shameful. It can remind you of Martin Scorsese’s “King of Comedy” and how criminals and idiots become hero in USA. It’s a very serious problem. Apparently, “Abramoff has become a critic of the lobbying industry”. Now, he claims: I’m an anti-corruption blogger [!!!]”. Funny Iranians say: “Oh, Yah. If Hitler was arrested in today’s USA, he would be released after a few years, and then Hitler would become an anti-Holocaust blogger ! In today’s USA, Hitler can become a critic of mass murder and Holocaust. Bin Laden can become a critic of terrorism; Khamenei and Mr. shit can become a critic of Election Fraud, Killing people, Tyranny and Financial corruption. And Reza Pahlavi and Saudi’s king can become a critic of monarchy and dictatorship !. The US is a joke, a very stupid joke”. The media reported: “According to former Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad, Abramoff was paid $1.2 million to arrange a meeting between Mahathir and Bush [!!] Abramoff granted a press interview to Vanity Fair magazine in 2006, and asserted Bush and other prominent figures in Washington know him very well. He called them liars for denying contact with him”. But now, both Bush and Abramoff are free, and Abramoff has become a hero ! It’s really shocking and embarrassing. Unfortunately, today’s USA seems like a stupid Mafia B-movie. Instead of following the stupid Chomsky like sheep, Americans should think about real, clear, and progressive changes. Chomsky, the stupid lefts, and their OWS are part of the current stupid B-movie. And both the Iranian people and the American people are main victims of this stupid B-movie.

Kim Ki-duk and Eastern Films

May 14, 2012

The cinema is a global language, and all humans can understand the good Eastern or Western films, because we all are human, and our life, our problems, and our challenges are alike. In the East, Japan, India, and Iran have an old or well-known cinema, but in the recent two decades, some counties like South Korea have had some good filmmakers, and Kim Ki-duk (1960-now) is one of them. Kim Ki-duk is a good South Korean filmmaker that has some good films. In Iran and other parts of the world, many only know the South Korean adult films or its shitty TV series, but Kim Ki-duk has some good films, and at least one of his films can give you some sort of “Inner Peace”. In this shitty world, that many still are prisoners of the basic needs and the animal needs, the humans still seek “Inner Peace”. And Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring (2003) is a movie about “Inner Peace”, “Buddhism”, and the human life. I give this movie 7/10. The story is about the life of a Buddhist monk as he passes through the seasons of his life, from childhood to old age. The Mullah TV has shown this film, in about 85 min, but the movie’s runtime is about 105 min. The film is very poetic and very quiet, but the idiots in the Mullah TV had censored the scenes that were related to the relation between the girl and the young Buddhist. “Spring, …” is a quiet film, and takes a look at life as a whole, while other Kim Ki-duk’s films are R-rated or X-rated movies about special problems. Many think Kim Ki-duk’s films are like other stupid Chinese or South Korean adult films, but Kim Ki-duk is a good filmmaker. At least, two of Kim Ki-duk’s films, “3-Iron (Bin-jip) (2004)” and “Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring (2003)”, that I watched them, were good films. In 2004, he received Best Director awards at two different film festivals, for two different films. At the Berlin International Film Festival , he was awarded for Samaritan Girl (2004), and at the Venice Film Festival he won for 3-Iron (Bin-jip) (2004). “Spring, …” is a quiet film with beautiful scenes. In first season, the Spring, we see a very young Buddhist living with his master on a small floating monastery, drifting on a lake in the serene forested mountains of Korea. It’s a very beautiful valley and a good place for shooting a movie. All the film is happening in this small valley, and in the five seasons (of the human life). We never leave the valley that surrounds the lake, we never know what year is currently going on outside of the forest, but we see how a young boy grows and becomes an old man. Many things are symbolic, and are related to the Buddhism’s philosophy. For instance, the doors have no walls, so they have just symbolic meaning. But the people treat the doors as they have walls, and open and close them like the normal doors, and only when the young Buddhist want to live like an ordinary boy, he ignores the rules. The beauty of the scenes is really amazing. I think the main part of the pleasure of seeing this film belongs to its beautiful scenes, its cinematography, and its music. And it’s what many Iranian filmmakers don’t care about it. In this film, the beauty of nature is being maximized by the art of the camera. The music is great, specially what you hear at the end of the Summer and at the end of the movie. It’s really good. It can give you some sort of “Inner Peace”. Of course, this film is not so deep, and what it says about many problems or the roots of problems is stupid, but many in all the world like this film, because it’s about the human life and part of the human problems in all around the world. You can watch it, enjoy its beauty, and forget this shitty world, at least for two hours.


East Asia (China), like Southern Asia (India) and West Asia (Persia), has a rich culture and an ancient civilization, and cinema can show it to you. “Spring, Summer, …” can show you that the humans in all around the world are like each other. Iran’s culture and Iranian mysticism have many similarities with East Asia’. Since the ancient time, the Chinese were familiar with Persia and its rich culture, and vice versa. So, Iranians can understand many things in East Asia (except their foods and eating Cockroaches !), but other nations can understand the Eastern Asians, as well, because all of us are human. “Spring, …” is a symbolic movie that all humans can understand its main subject. It gives all humans some sort of good feelings, because many things in this film is beautiful, simple, and about the main human problems. Of course, the film has many stupid things. In the Summer, a girl that has an unspecified illness is brought to the Buddhist master by her mother. The young isolated Buddhist is s-e-x-ually attracted to the young girl, that is quite normal, but the film tries to say “s-e-x = corruption and murder”. The old monk says: “Lust awakens the desire to possess. And that awakens the intent to murder”. The old monk says the girl should go. Unable to live without her, the boy leaves the monastery and follows the girl. They get married, she cheats on him, and he kills her. It’s a stupid cliché. Who says that if you had s-e-x, you would become a killer? In this way, all humans were serial killers! But the truth is, if you were a stupid isolated man like the isolated monks, you would become a psycho and a killer. But despite all stupid things in the film, it’s not a bad film, and can give you some sort of “Inner Peace”. The beautiful nature, the beautiful music, and the simplicity can tell you many things. Kim Ki-duk said of the film: “I intended to portray the joy, anger, sorrow and pleasure of our lives through four seasons and through the life of a monk who lives in a temple surrounded only by nature. The floating temple was used to show the speed in which life can change, the way that one can wake up and find that East has become West and West has become East, that irony of life“. In fact, in the recent decades, the West tries to become like the East, and the East tries to become like the West. What you can see in Iran, India, China, Japan, South Korea, etc, can show you that the Eastern people want to become like the westerners. But at the same time, what you can see in the US and Europe, and how much they care about Buddhism, Inner Peace, etc can show you that the Western people want to become like the easterners, too. Some think it’s a bad thing, but I think it’s a good thing. The people in all around the world are human, and can learn from each other and can try to solve their problems with the help of each other. It’s a very good thing. It’s part of a good globalization.


“Spring, Summer, …” can force you to think about the life and the main problems in human life. You can see it as a film about “Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs”, and about the unsatisfied needs, the higher needs, the human needs, and the animal needs. It’s a film about the human stupidities and the tragedy of life. The five seasons can show you the speed of your aging process. These seasons are seasons of human life. The first Spring is full of stupid mistakes or stupid dreams. The Summer is full of naivety, animal needs, stupid dreams, stupid mistakes, etc. The Fall is full of regret, anger, etc. And the Winter is when you can gain wisdom, before it’s too late. Finally, returning to “Spring”, the cycle is completed: you have a stupid boy that has become a wise old man, but … In the film, the new master lives in the monastery with the abandoned baby, now his apprentice. The boy is shown to repeating the old mistakes, echoing his predecessor. History repeats itself. It’s a bitter truth, but humans can try to find a solution for it. It’s a solvable problem (I would write about it later). In this film, the old monk and his lifestyle is a cliché, a stupid cliché, but the way he accepts his death and kills himself is interesting. He seals his ears, eyes, nose and mouth with paper, and commits suicide at his death’s time. Since the ancient time, the humans dream about this sort of death. They didn’t want to die like animals. When you see how animals die, specially how elephants die, it reminds you of human death, and it has created many philosophical questions about death, life, afterlife, and many other things since the ancient time. Recently, I saw a documentary film about elephants’ death, that was very interesting. The elephants’ natural death is so tragic, like the humans’ death. And perhaps that’s why some ancient Indians talked about afterlife for both humans and animals. You should see elephants’ natural death, and only after that you can understand ancient Indians, and also why the wise people defend animals’ rights. “Kim ki-duk was accused of hurting animals in his films. He said it’s part of East Asia’s traditions, but many Koreans protested against him, and he made this film for answering them. Kim ki-duk himself appears as the man in the Winter season, to show that he and his films are not only about s-e-x and violence”, some say. The Mullah TV showed “Spring, …”, but they didn’t show other Kim ki-duk’s films, because as funny Iranians say: “When the stupid Mullahs censored these films, nothing remained”. But they are not bad films. At least “3-Iron” that I saw it, is not a bad film. 3-Iron’s plot revolves around the relationship between a young drifter and an abused housewife. The film is notable for the lack of dialogue between its characters. In fact, “Spring, …” and “3-Iron” have a few dialogue. The dialogue in “Spring, Summer, …” is rare and stupid, but the scenes and the music tell you many things. And in “3-Iron”, the characters are depressed or silent. In fact, many Eastern Asians are not talkative, unlike many Iranians who are talkative. Maybe, that’s why they have many depressed people there. I don’t know why many Easter Asians are shy or silent. Is it a genetic issue or a cultural issue? Anyway, recently I watched a good Japanese movie in the state TV, Castaway on the Moon (2009) , and I liked it. I have not watched the original version that its runtime is 115min. The Mullah TV show it in about 105min, but it was acceptable. At first, it seemed like a stupid film and a stupid version of “Cast Away (2000)” (By Zemeckis and Tom Hanks) that I loved it, but after a while it became a good film about a depressed boy and a depressed girl in Japan. The girl who takes close-up shots of the moon and has not left her apartment in years, spies the cast away boy on the island, and it changes their lives. This movie is about Hope, depression, modern life, modern youths in the modern world, etc. And again, it can show you how similar are humans in all around the world, and how tragic the life is in all around the world.


Iranians and non-Iranians can understand the Eastern cinema or the Western cinema, because the cinema is a global language. We all are human, and our life and our problems are alike. What is called “the cultural difference” is really a marginal thing. Even two siblings have their own differences. When you think about the East, you can’t stop thinking about the story of Iran, Japan, China, and South Korea in the past 150 years. Iran and Japan started their modernism at the same time, while China and South Korea were behind them. But the West and the story of Colonialism, and and the story of Oil, changed many things. In 1970s, Iran tried to be as successful as Japan, while China and South Korea were less developed than Iran. When Iran had the car industry in 1960s and 1970s, South Korea had nothing, except a military dictatorship. But the West didn’t allow Iran to become a powerful country, and when the new Western puppets (Mullahs) were destroying Iran, South Korea started its rapid modernism. Today’s South Korea can show you how the Mullahs destroyed Iran. In fact, if the West and the Western puppets, specially the Mullahs, had not destroyed Iran and its image, at least Iran would have been like today’s South Korea. If you want to know how the Mullahs destroyed Iran, you can compare Iran and South Korea in the 2010s and in the 1970s. Today’s conditions in South Korea and its global position, is the minimum that Iranians could have it now. The culture, the contemporary history, the problems, etc in Iran and South Korea are almost alike. So, you can look at South Korea, and see how the Mullahs destroyed Iran. Of course, the human resources, the human development and many other things that are related to the people, not the regimes, have their own natural state in Iran, Korea, and Japan, and today’s Iranians are at least as modern as and as wise as their counterparts in Japan and Korea. But if you want to see how the Mullahs destroyed Iran and its position, you can see it in this simple fact that today the South Koreans can travel to 130 countries without visa, but Iranians … . I hope Iranians and all other nations can get rid of the brutal dictatorship and can realize their potential. It’s good for the whole world. Anyway, Kim Ki-duk’s page in has many interesting things about Kim ki-duk and South Korea. They say: “Kim ki-duk’s family moved to Seoul when he was 9, and there he attended agricultural training school before dropping out at age 17 to take up work in factories. From age 20 to 25 he served in the marines, where he is said to have fit in well. Afterwards he spent two years at a church for the visually impaired with the thought of becoming a preacher. Then in 1990, scraping up all the money he had to buy a plane ticket, he traveled to Paris where he spent two years selling his paintings (a lifelong hobby) on the street. Kim says he went to the movie theater for the first time in his life at this time” I don’t know it’s a joke, or it’s a true thing, but if it’s true, it again could show you how the Mullahs destroyed Iran. It also can be a good lesson for all of us: “Don’t worry about the past or the wasted times. Just start to realize your potential. It’s not late, just stand up and follow your dreams”. They add: “Kim is a rare case of a director who has won accolades and found box-office success overseas, but has largely failed to connect with Korean critics or audiences. In terms of his influences, his aesthetics, the stories he tells, and his local and international reception, Kim Ki-duk seems to inhabit a world all his own. A major shift occurred in Kim’s career with his ninth, ‘Spring, …’. Although he continued to focus on marginalized elements of society, his work took on a more consciously spiritual aspect, downplaying violence. Kim’s softer style played well with foreign audiences. ‘Spring, …’ and ‘3-Iron’ were strong successes in Europe and North America”. Apparently, many Koreans hate Kim ki-duk, and it’s a typical problem in all Eastern nations. I don’t know whether Kim Ki-duk is a Khayemal (ass-kisser) or not. But if he is not a Khayemal like Abbas Khayemal (Kiarostami), South Koreans should stop being stupid. Kim ki-duk is free to make his own movies, and if he is not a Khayemal or charlatan like Abbas Khayemal (Kiarostami), he deserves the international attention. I hope one day in the near future, all people in all around the world, can get rid of the brutal dictatorship, can enjoy the freedom and democracy, and can express themselves. That day, many people can show their talents and can realize their potential. And that day the world will become a better world, and all humans will have a better world.

Will of God, Miracles, and Mahnaz Afshar !

April 6, 2012

“The majority of Americans still believe in the will of God and miracles. Their motto still is: ‘In God is our trust'”, the American media report. But those who don’t believe in miracles, including the young Iranians, can see the will of God and many great miracles by taking a look at the celebs. For instance, Mahnaz Afshar, one of the most famous Iranian celebrities and female film starts , who has many fans in Iran, can show you the will of God and the great miracle. Of course, almost all celebs can show us many miracles, including miracles of god, miracles of money, miracles of media, miracles of stupidity, miracles of brainwashing, miracles of kissing ass, etc.

When the media published the first pictures of Mahnaz Afshar and her mother, many could not understand whether what they see is a miracle of God or a miracle of Photoshop. Mahnaz Afshar’s fans thought Mahnaz Afshar’s mother should look like Marilyn Monroe, or Googoosh, a famous Iranian celebrity, but “they were ignorant and didn’t know that it’s the will of God and the miracle of the genes that determine who should be Mahnaz Afshar or who should be Mr. shit or Lady Gaga”, as some say.


Mahnaz Afshar’s fans didn’t know that she has her own dark sides, and thought “being Mahnaz Afshar” is not a matter of luck. “In fact, sometimes genes play funny games and create miracle. But some thinks it’s the will of God, some thinks it’s chance, and some thinks it’s a miracle of money and genetic engineering”, some say. They add: “Some celebrities are as honest as Mahnaz Afshar and show their dark sides, but others think ‘they have come out of Elephant’s ass’. They are like the racists and the Monarchists who think that there is a ‘greatness’ gene or a ‘master’ gene that they have it, but others have ‘slave’ gene or ‘inferiority’ gene and should be slave of them”.


The second pictures of Mahnaz Afshar and her mother forced the unbelievers to seriously think about the will of God and miracles. Mahnaz Afshar, herself, has said: “Ask Mr. Creator why he created me like Mrs Googoosh”. It shows that Mahnaz Afshar is not like the ultra-stupid people – specially the Monarchists, the rich kids, the stupid celebs, the racist Westerners, and the stupid kids of mercenaries and ass kissers – who think their good luck is not luck, or it’s not a miracle of kissing ass, but it’s merit, something like a merit scholarship from God.


Almost all humans have a special talent, and should try to fulfill their potential. For instance, Mahnaz Afshar is very photogenic, or some celebs are musical genius. Of course, some are good ass-kissers, good sheep, good thieves, and good mercenaries, like the Iranian Monarchists, but it’s not a special talent. It’s just a shame. As the wise people say: “we all can be a miracle, but sometimes we focus on a talent or potential that we don’t have it, and it leads to great tragedies like Lady Gaga’s tragedy. So, If you have a special talent, just try to focus on your own special talent, and don’t be so greedy”. And don’t forget that only a few people are like Reza Pahlavi and have no special talent. But other men have at least one special talent, and many special talents are much more important than “being very photogenic”.


Most of today’s celebrities in the West and the whole world are really disasters, but the people who are very photogenic still can become “Model” or “Film Star”, and it’s not bad. As you know, some people, including Mahnaz Afshar, are very photogenic with or without the Islamic veil (Hejab). But some say: “The people who are very photogenic, often have small brains, and it’s the ‘Divine Justice’. You can be a blond or a brain, but not both ! and it’s the will of God !” Of course, you can be a blond, a brain, or something in between, if you don’t have a tendency to see the issues in black and white. But if you are a Mullah or a Monarchist, you only can be ugly and brainless. There is no exception.


Mahnaz Afshar’s mother is an ordinary mother like many other mothers in the world. Iranians and many other people in all around world love their mothers, not because they are photogenic or musical genius, but because they are good mothers. Each person has a special talent, and some are good mothers or good fathers. But the wise funny guys say: “Please stop producing children at any price. Be responsible. And don’t forget that only some couples have good luck and can produce a very photogenic child. In fact, only a few couples are as lucky as Mahnaz Afshar’s parents; and many others just create a horrible disaster for themselves and their children”.


The good mothers, who are responsible and care about their children a lot, are really like angels, even when they are not very photogenic. The good and responsible mothers and what they do are really miracles. They are “believable miracles”. But if you think you want to live your own life, or you just want to fulfill your own human potentials, or you are irresponsible, idiot, hypocrite, or selfish, please don’t produce any child. The bad parents are like the devil or the Iranian Monarchists, and their children can become great criminals, great disasters, or would suffer from horrible mental disorders.

P.S. We want to joke with the famous celebrities, and for the first time I decide to choose an Iranian celebrity. It’s just joke and satire, for thinking about some serious issues, and I hope the celebrities and their fans don’t take it seriously.

A Separation, An Actress, A Role, and An Image

February 29, 2012

‘A Separation’ is not a foreign film at all. Those people are exactly like us“, many Western film critics say. If you want to know why ‘A Separation’ has made such an impact in the West, you should know that many ignorant people in the West had horrible misconceptions about Iran and Iranians; They thought: “Iranians live in the deserts. They have no car, no street, no fridge, no washing machine, no modern life, nothing. Iranians are uncivilized people”. If you want to understand the depth of the tragedy, you can think of a naive person who believes that “Sareh Bayat” is like her role (Razieh) and her image in “A Separation”. But the image of “Sareh Bayat” in “A Separation” is not like Bayat’s real life. It’s a false image. It’s just a movie. But the naive people can’t understand it. And it can be like the story of the false image of Iran in the Western media. The naive people in the West can’t understand that today’s Iran is not like the false image of Iran in the Western media. The below pictures are the real pictures of “Sareh Bayat”. You can compare them with “Razieh”, her role in “A Separation”, and think about it. (Of course, the differences between today’s Iran and the false image of Iran in the Western media, are so big, and you should compare Razieh with the nude pictures of Bayat! But I could not find her nude pix)


As we said before, Farhadi’s film, A Separation, is conservative. “A Separation” deliberately ignores many serious things. But the film still can show you many good things. For example, Nader teaches her daughter the life skills. He teaches her not to be sheep. It’s common in Iran. When Nader asks Termeh a question, and Termeh gives a wrong answer, and when for justifying herself she says: ‘it’s what our teacher has said. It’s what our books have said”, Nader answers: “Never use this excuse again. What is wrong, is wrong. It’s not important who says it or where it’s written”. And when Termeh says: “OK, but in this way they don’t give me a proper grade”, Nader answers: “It’s not important”. In fact, Iranians fight against “brainwashing” and “living like stupid sheep”, and that’s why the Mullahs can’t brainwash the majority of Iranians and their kids. The family and the parents fight against the lies and the stupid things that the Mullahs, from the Mullah media to the Mullah education system, try to teach their kids. It’s very important. It’s what the world can learn from Iranians.


The Western media often doesn’t say that Iran has a young, educated, and modern population that is trying to express itself under a very brutal theocratic tyranny. In 2012, we can see that ‘ignorance is a bliss’ in the West, and many people are either ignorant or naive there. Unfortunately, we also can see that many people are racist, chauvinist, or nationalist there. They clearly say that they have problem with Iran and Iranians, not with the Mullahs. They clearly say that a free and democratic Iran is not in their national interests, and they prefer a weak puppet regime in Iran -like the Mullah regime and the Pahlavi regime. It’s really horrible. These racist people are bad guys who don’t care about the truth, the freedom, democracy, human rights, and other human values. They only care about their animal interests. They are very shortsighted and fanatic, like the animals. It’s very annoying and disappointing. But all people in the West are not like them. Many people are just unaware of the truth; They are not like the bad guys, who deliberately don’t want to see the truth, and don’t care about the truth. I hope they can open their eyes and can see the truth, via the film industry or the internet.


‘A Separation’ had two Oscar nominations, mainly because many truly thought ‘A Separation’ is not a foreign film. It’s very important. The non-Iranians think that “Sareh Bayat” should be a religious fanatic woman in her real life, and maybe that’s why they ignored her good performance in “A Separation’, and didn’t care about her in the Oscar. They even didn’t invite her to the Academy Awards ceremony. But the following pictures can show you that the woman who played “Razieh”, is an ordinary Iranian and a good actress. Meryl Streep played the role of a religious fanatic in ‘Doubt’ (2008), but it doesn’t mean that she is a religious fanatic in her real life. The same is true about Sareh Bayat and many other actors. “Sareh Bayat” was a forgotten actress at Oscar 2012. But before the Oscar, she had received the Silver Bear for Best Actress in a Supporting Role from Berlin International Film Festival, and in the 32nd London Critics Circle Film Awards she won Supporting Actress of the Year. Razieh was very religious, while the pictures clearly show that Bayat is not like Razieh. Of course, some say: “If Bayat, in her real life, was a decent and honest woman like Razieh, it would be great. In fact, if Razieh could be more modern and open-minded, she would be a great woman”. It’s not wrong.


Some truly say: “There are many talented people in Iran who will never produce anything because of all the limitations, blocks, obstacles, anti Sharia accusations, etc. Please do not treat Iranians like some aliens who can’t be creative or win Oscars. Without the current regime, a lot more Iranians would have been able to compete in a lot more international events”. It’s really true. The false image of Iran, that is produced by the Mullahs and the Western media, is very stupid and very shameful. They don’t say anything about the important differences between the Iran’s regime and the Iran’s people. They deliberately don’t say that the Iran’s regime is a hated regime in Iran, and only about 5% of the people support it. They don’t say that more than 70 millions of Iranians are victims of a very brutal medieval regime. They say nothing about the Mullah election show. They don’t say that the bad guys in the West support this medieval regime, while the majority of Iranians hate it. They don’t say that Iranians inside Iran followed the Oscar ceremony and other international events via illegal satellite dishes. They don’t say that Iranians inside Iran are not ignorant, and most of them are at least as wise as their counterparts in the west.


After seeing “A Separation”, some people in the West said: “We didn’t know that everyone in Iran has a fridge, a TV set, a washing machine, etc. We didn’t know that many Iranians have car, modern life, and modern thoughts. But now, we know that many things in Iran, like divorce, aging parents, economics, religion and social standing can be applied to any circumstance in any modern culture. The culture in Iran seemed mysterious, but now we know that the Iranian culture is like our culture”. It’s good that finally an Iranian film could show part of the real image of Iran. “‘A Separation’ drives home the oft-ignored fact that Iran is full of educated, sophisticated and cultured people who don’t agree with their government“, an American film critic said. It’s really true. The bad guys in the West, from the mass media to the politicians, tell big shameful lies and try to distort the facts. The bad guys in the West are like the bad guys in Iran, and both of them try to create false images, hatred, and war. The bad guys are stupid and think it’s in their interests, and it makes huge profits for them. But it’s shortsightedness. If they can see their own long term interests, they would change their minds. But they are blind and stupid. They still try to live like animals, and try to exploit others. And unfortunately, the ignorant people and the conservative people help the bad guys a lot.


As we said before, Farhadi has become conservative. In 2009, he defended the Iranian movement and the martyrs, when he was in Paris, and in 2010, he even defended the Iranian movement, when he was in Tehran, in the House of Cinema ceremony. But now in 2012, he even doesn’t defend the House of Cinema, and say nothing about the great tragedy of the Iranian cinema. He doesn’t say that the Mullahs recently closed the House of Cinema -that more than 4000 Iranian filmmakers were its members (It was a non-governmental body that helped and supported the Iranian filmmakers). The fate of the House of Cinema, and Farhadi’s reaction to it, both are very shameful and meaningful. The fate of the House of Cinema also can show you why we say :”the majority of the Iranian filmmakers are Khayemal (ass-kisser)”. Anyway, Farhadi has become conservative, and his film is conservative as well, and doesn’t answer many questions. For instance, at the beginning of the film, the judge asks Simin why she wants to leave Iran. She responds that she doesn’t want to raise her daughter “in these circumstances”. But Farhadi never says or shows any thing about “these circumstances“. Non-Iranians ask themselves: “What circumstances?” But they can’t find their answer in the film.


If you want to know the answer of “What circumstances?”, you should think about the difference between the Iran’s regime and the Iran’s people; You should think about what happened in 2009, when the savage Mullahs killed, raped, and tortured tens of thousands of the ordinary Iranians. You can also think about the difference between an actress, Sareh Bayat, and her role, Razieh. Sareh Bayat only played Rezieh’s role. But Sareh Bayat and many other Iranian actors are like the majority of Iranians who are modern, and hate the Mullahs, their norms and their laws. Farhadi’s film, A Separaion, only shows you the Iran’s people, and doesn’t say anything about the Iran’s regime. Of course, even this limited image can be very useful for the outside world, and that’s why some wise American film critics say: “You may walk out of the theater, but you can’t walk out of the movie (‘A Separation’). Because its story is all around us. Much of the reason that ‘A Separation’ has made such an impact in the West -a virtual sweep of the critics’ prizes, a Golden Globe and two Oscar nominations, including a virtually unheard of nod for a non-US screenplay – is that it isn’t a foreign film at all“.

Oscar 2012 and Asghar Farhadi

February 27, 2012

A Separation and Asghar Farhadi won the best foreign language film at the 84th Academy Awards. Asghar Farhadi’s film is the first Persian film that wins the Oscar. Farhadi was nominated for a best screenplay Oscar, too. The Academy Award is just the latest for ‘A Separation,’ which has already collected a Golden Globe, an Independent Spirit Award, the Cesar Award (French Oscar) and many other statuettes during this awards season. The 84th Academy Awards was really non-American, because the Best Film, Best Director, and Best Actor were French. Billy Crystal, the host, that told some good jokes tonight, said: “They must be going nuts in France right now, or whatever the French have in place of joy”. It’s interesting to know that Farhadi’s film, ‘A Separation’, has become a great event in the US, because it shows part of the real image of today’s Iran and today’s Iranians. This film also shows the world that many issues in Iran and other parts of the world are global issues, and the people in all around the world, specially the Iranian people and the people in the West, have many things in common. As we said before, the root of many things in the West, from the culture to the religion, is Iran and its Aryan Culture. Iran, that means “the land of Aryans”, is really one of the main Cradles of Civilization in the world. It’s funny to know that almost all film critics in the US have said positive things about “A Separation”, and tonight all of them said: “The win is well deserved”.


“The 84th Academy Awards ceremony, on February 26, 2012 (5:30 pm, with a red carpet ceremony at 4 pm), was televised live in the United States on ABC. This year’s awards took place at the Hollywood and Highland Centre (formerly the Kodak theatre) after film company Kodak filed for bankruptcy and asked for. Billy Crystal was the host. This is Crystal’s ninth time serving as host for the Academy Awards. (Bob Hope has the record, 18 times)”, the media reported. Kodak bankruptcy was a funny sign of the economic crisis in the US. ‘We’re here at the beautiful Chapter 11 theatre‘ announced Billy Crystal. He added: ‘The movies have always been there for us. So tonight, enjoy yourself. Because nothing can take the sting out of our economic worries more than millionaires presenting themselves with little gold statues‘. It’s really the best joke about the stupidities of the Oscar Ceremony, and also those people who care about it a lot. Anyway, “The Artist” and “Hugo” both won five awards. The Artists won Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor. The Artist had 11 nominations, and Hugo had 10 nominations. The Iron Lady won two awards, including Best Actress for Meryl Streep. It is her third Oscar win from an astounding 17 nominations. Woody Allen won Best Writing. You can check the full list of the winners here .


“Meryl Streep and Farhadi met each other before the Oscar night”, the Iranian media reported. But many knew nothing about what happened at the Spirit Award ceremony. Those who love the gossip and the stupid things a lot, have slept now, but they would care about this matter a lot, at tomorrow. “Kate Beckinsale kisses Asghar Farhadi as she presents him with the award for Best International Film at the 2012 Film Independent Spirit Awards in Santa Monica, California, February 25, 2012”, the American media reported. Apparently, Farhadi has tried to answer to the critiques about Angelina Jolie’s story. I don’t know why these stupid things should be important for many people. Tonight, many cared about Angelina Jolie’s leg, Jennifer Lopez’s tits, Angelina Jolie’s arms, and other stupid things that is part of the usual stupidity of the Academy Awards ceremony. “When the modern sheep care about these matters a lot, what can we expect from today’s world. The media play with us, and the politicians exploit us, but many still live like sheep and care about the stupid things a lot. And that’s why we call the current era ‘The Age of Stupidity'”, some say. It’s so obvious that the people need joy and entertainment, but joy and entertainment is one thing, and living like sheep is another thing. Anyway, Sandra Bullock presents the Oscar for best foreign language film to Iranian film A Separation. And Farhadi’s speech was like his films, that means it was not bad, but it was not good, too.


Asghar Farhadi’s Oscar speech was not so bad, but it could be much more better. Farhadi said: ‘At this time, many Iranians all over the world are watching us. And I imagine them to be very happy. They are happy not because of an important award or a film or a filmmaker. But because at the time when talk of war, intimidation and aggression is exchanged between politicians, the name of their country, Iran, is spoken here through her glorious culture. A rich and ancient culture that has been hidden under the heavy dust of politics. I proudly offer this award to the people of my country, a people who respect all cultures and civilizations and despise hostility and resentment”. Farhadi’s speech had good parts. But he had to offer this award to the victims and the martyrs. He had to talk about the people’s pain and sufferings in the past two years. He had to talk about Mr. Stupid Monkey (Obama) and how he betrayed Iranians and the freedom and democracy in the 2009-2011 period, and how he still betray the people. He had to talk about the savage Mullahs who kill and torture the people. He had to talk about many things, with a wise and short speech. He had enough time to write a good short speech for tonight. But his speech was like his films. Apparently, you can’t expect more things from him. I hope one day the younger generations of Iranians, that many of them are much more talented and much more open-minded than Farhadi, can show the world that Farhadi and his film are just a very small part of the Iran’s reality, and today’s Iran has many wiser and braver people, and also many better works. Of course, Farhadi and his films are not bad or embarrassing, and he deserves the awards. But Farhadi showed that he has the potential for becoming “Asghar Khayemal” (Asghar ass-kisser)


The 84th Oscar was a French Oscar. The little known French director, Michel Hazanavicius, was “the happiest director in the world”, as he himself said. And the French actor, Jean Dujardin, who won Best Actor, was the happiest actor in the world. Crystal said: “They must be going nuts in France right now, or whatever the French have in place of joy”. In these days, many Iranians don’t care about the Oscar a lot. When Mr. stupid monkey (Obama) and other European and American monkeys, who betrayed Iranians and the freedom and democracy in Iran and aided the Mullahs in killing Iranians, desperately try to torture the ordinary Iranians, who cares about the Oscar? When Mr. stupid monkey (Obama) and other Western monkeys try to make a good deal with the Mullahs, and most of the ordinary people in the West forget what happened in 2009 and who betrayed who and who was the bad guy, who can care about the Oscar a lot? As Crystal said millionaires presenting themselves with little gold statues and some winners become millionaire, but what happen to the ordinary people? Who speaks about or cares about the ordinary people and their pain and suffering? Some funny Iranians say: “the (below) pictures prove that Farhadi’s daughter (Sarina Farhadi) has more balls that his father ! Farhadi’s daughter has the balls to appear without Hijab (Islamic veil), while Leila Hatami has not the balls, and Farhadi himself has not the balls to give a good speech at the Oscar night”. The below picture, that is a picture before the 84th Academy Awards on Feb. 26, 2012, show (from left): Leila Hatami, Mahmoud Kalari, Peyman Moadi, Sarina Farhadi, Thomas Langmann, and Asghar Farhadi)


The 84th Academy Awards had its own special moments. The media reported: “Streep’s speech begins on a disarmingly self-deprecating note. ‘When they called my name I imagined half of America going ‘Aw, no! Her! Again!’. Hugo, Scorsese’s 3D film, is dominating the technical categories and comfortably leads the field. The traditional Oscar obituary montage, was a sad, soulful trip along the stills of Ben Gazzara, Elizabeth Taylor, etc. After 82-year-old Christopher Plummer won the supporting actor prize, Crystal quipped: ‘The average age for winners has just jumped to 67’. ‘Please welcome the original girl with the dragon tattoo,’ says Billy Crystal, waving one arm to introduce Angelina Jolie. We learned that ‘Angelina Jolie’s Right Leg’ has its very own Twitter account. Jolie wanted to gave Oscar to Woody Allen, but he was no there. He was back in New York, he doesn’t like LA. ‘The Academy accepts this award on his behalf,’ smiles Jolie. Meryl Streep’s makeup artist took home a statuette for transforming Streep into Maggie Thatcher. ‘The Undefeated’ wins best documentary, one of the producers calls it ‘f-u-c-k-ing wonderful’ ! Backstage heard it, producers bleeped it out for the audience at home. Crystal said that when he came out of ‘The Help’ he wanted to ‘hug the first black woman that I saw. From Beverly Hills, thats about a 45 minute drive‘.” Some of Billy Crystal’s jokes were really good.


Before the Oscar night, Peyman Moadi’s wrote an open letter to Farhadi. He wrote: “Here in Iran, many (Mullahs and Mullah film critics) try to say that your film is a bad or weak film, and you don’t deserve to win the awards, and your awards are political awards … I always thought Woody Allen is a genius. When Woody Allen sent a message to you, via her sister, and said that he could not go to LA, but we would be happy to see you in New York to discuss about your film, I finally realized the true meaning of what others say about ‘A Separation’. Woody Allen had said that for years he didn’t expect to be able to see a film, not only from our cinema, but from the cinema in the whole world, that had such impact on him. When the producer of ‘the Artist’ said: ‘When I saw ‘A Separation’ I wished I was its producer’ … When Angelina Jolie asked you, honestly and without any gesture, to play in your next film, and when you said that your next film is a French language film, and she said that she can learn the French language until that time, it was really one of the proudest moment. When Meryl Streep asked you about the film directing, and then said that she wants to work with you, or when Spielberg said ‘A Separation’ is the best film of this year in the whole world, and when many others that I am not allowed to name them here, said that your film is their favorite film, I understood that ‘A Separation’ is a great film … your story with Robert De Niro, Bob Dylan, and many others that praised you and your film, should be told … In New York, when you said: ‘the similarities between the people in all around the world is much more than their differences, but the politicians try to emphasize the differences, and pretend that the differences are so big‘ , they warmly applauded you”


Moadi added: “An American Film critic had said: ‘If you want to attack Iran, first watch ‘A Separation’ and see the people that you want to attack them. After that, you would change your minds’ Asghar you have done your duty. Your film was more important that your speech (at the Golden Globe or Oscar)”. It’s true. ‘A Separation’ is not a bad film. But If Moadi tries to say that it’s a great film, it’s not true. ‘A Separation’ has become a great event, because it’s the first Iranian film that tries to show a true image of Iran. The world knows nothing about today’s Iran, and it’s the first time that the world can see part of the real image of today’s Iran and Iranians in a film. That’s why ‘A Separation’ has become a great event. But Farhadi has become conservative, and it’s not good. His speech could be better. The Oscar night was a rare opportunity, and he could use it better. Of course, no once expect him to be an intellectual, or a hero, but at least he could repeat what he had already said about the martyrs and the Iranian movement. Anyway, in the recent days, John Anderson wrote an article in the CNN (on February 20, 2012), with the title “How an Iranian film unites us all”. What John Anderson wrote was the first reasonable thing that we heard from the Americans. We would write more about it later. “Parodying the Gaddafi-type dictator he plays in his upcoming film, ‘The Dictator,’ Baron Cohen showed up carrying what he said were the ashes of the late North Korean leader Kim Jong Il. Then he spilled them all over the E! host’s tuxedo”, the media reported. Baron Cohen and his ideas were funny. I hope one day in the near future, the comedians make joke about the toppled Mullahs in the Oscar ceremony.

A Separation (2011) and Asghar Farhadi’s Films

January 27, 2012

A Separation (2011) that won Golden Globe 2012, and is nominated for Oscar 2012, is like other Farhadi’s films, that means : “It’s not a bad film; and it’s not a good film”. After watching “A Separation”, that its full title is “Separation of Nader and Simin” or “Nader and Simin, A Separation”, I can say this film has many stupid problems, specially in cinematography, acting, and self-censorship. It would have been better if the previous films of Farhadi, specially About Elly (2009), or his best film Fireworks Wednesday (2006) , had won Golden Globe or Oscar, not “A Separation”. I watched ‘About Elly’ again, and it was really better than “A Separation”. I watched the first serious film of Farhadi, “Fireworks Wednesday” (Chaarshanbe Soori) again, and I think “A Separation” is a weaker version of this film. I give “A Separation” 6/10, “Fireworks Wednesday” 7/10, and “About Elly” 7/10 (only for its first 30 minutes that has some great scenes). If you want to understand how bad cinematography or acting is in “A Separation”, you can compare it with “Fireworks Wednesday”, that was a better version of “A Separation”, or with “About Elly”. The suspension in “Fireworks Wednesday” was a little weaker than “A Separation”, but other things, like the subject (marital infidelity), cinematography, acting, etc were better than “A Separation”. And “About Elly” had some great scenes. If you want to watch a film about today’s Iran and the majority of Iranians, who are young and modern, you should watch ‘About Elly’. Of course, Iranian filmmakers, including Asghar Farhadi, can’t show many parts of the real life in Iran, because the Mullahs don’t allow them and censor their works, but even those parts that Farhadi shows in his films, specially in “About Elly”, can be very interesting for the outside world. Iranian filmmakers, including Farhadi, can’t show women without Hijab, while the Iranian women have not Hijab in their private life and inside their homes. Iranian filmmakers can’t show many normal relationships between men and women, and many other common things in Iran, and also many problems in the society, because the Mullahs don’t allow them. So, what you see in the Iranian films is a censored version of “Reality”. Iranians and their private lives are much more modern and funnier than what you see in the Iranian films. But even this limited and censored image, shocks and surprises many non-Iranians. Some say: “There are many misconceptions about the Iranian society, and in particular about the role of women in the private life. But in today’s Iran, the women are empowered. Sepideh who’s treated as the matriarch of the group, and all other women in “About Elly” are real women in today’s Iran. The women speak freely and express their opinions, and have their votes considered when deciding for the group as a whole. The men and women dance, laugh, and are happy with each other, and it’s part of the ordinary life in Iran”. What you can see in “About Elly” and “A Separation” are the middle-class or average Iranians, and in “Fireworks Wednesday” you can see the lower class and the middle class. In “A Separation”, Fardahi is more conservative, and his self-censorship annoys many Iranians inside Iran. But even in “A Separation”, Farhadi doesn’t tell big shameful lies, and you can’t say what you see is unreal. “Fireworks Wednesday” is better than “A Separation”, and Farhadi is less conservative in “Fireworks Wednesday” and has less self-censorship. What you can see in Farhadi’s films is today’s Iran, a modern country with modern people and modern problems, and of course with a medieval regime, a dreadful tyranny, and its related problems.


The main weak point of “A Separation” is its stupid cinematography. When you watch this film (for the first time), you can’t stop using bad language about Kalari, the stupid cinematographer of this film. Camera shake that occurs during hand held shooting is so horrible in this film. In the recent years, ‘hand held shooting’ or ‘hand held camera’ has become a fashion in Iran, and many stupid cinematographers often use this technique, and give the viewers horrible headache. I don’t know why camera movements/ angles are so stupid in this film. The shaky camera kills you. The stupid Kalari has shit on the whole film. Even compared to “Fireworks Wednesday” or “About Elly”, camera art in “A Separation” is so horrible. I’m not a filmmaker or an expert, but like those who have watched many films and have learned something, I just compare this film to other films that I love them. Iranian filmmakers should forget “Hand-held camera”, they use it so badly. I don’t know why Farhadi has used a lot of “Medium Shot” and “Close-Up” in this film. I don’t know why he doesn’t allow the people to see Tehran and both its beauty and its ugliness. Some say: “Although an audience’s attention may be focused on characters in the foreground, they will also be looking at the background for additional clues/ information. Let the people, specially the future generations and non-Iranians who know nothing about Iran, see the background. Let the people see the streets and the city and the social life in the background, for god sake“. In “A Separation”, only in very a few scenes you see nice shots of streets or city. if this film had have more nice shots, it would have been a good film. But unfortunately, almost all shots are so stupid and you can’t see anything expect the actors and camera shake ! I don’t know why Farhadi has forgotten color and music. Some of stupid fans of Farhadi say: “Without even a single note of music, Farhadi makes great films”. But its so stupid. Why Farhadi doesn’t use any music in his films? In ‘About Elly’, we don’t hear any music, while this film could have a very nice music, specially natural music in the cars or when they want to dance, or when they are scared or exhausted, etc. It’s a great weak point for Fardai. Of course, I know that the savage Mullahs censors the good music, but Farhadi doesn’t use any music, even legal or classic music, in his films. If ‘A Separation’ had not have the stupid ‘shaky camera’ and many stupid ‘Medium Shot’, and instead, if it had have many good ‘Wide-angle shot’, ‘Long Shot’, ‘Extreme Long Shot’, etc, and if we had been able to see Tehran, its streets, its people, its social life, etc in the background, then this film would become a good film. “Fireworks Wednesday” was a better film, because it had a little good music, a little nice shots of Tehran and streets, etc. In 2006, we thought: “Oh, it’s his first serious film. In his next films he will be better”. But apparently, Farhadi wants to go backward, instead of going forward! When you see Woody Allen’s films, you can see New York or Manhattan. He makes film about the human relationship and the domestic life, but he shows you many things about New York or Manhattan, too. And his nice shots give you good feeling and also good information. It’s what Farhadi and many other Iranians filmmakers forget it. “A Separation” should show us Tehran and the streets and many other things in the background, but it doesn’t show us anything. But in “Fireworks Wednesday” we can see more things in background, and we can see more nice shots. Farhadi should go forward, but form “Fireworks Wednesday” to “A Separation” he has gone backward.


The other weak points of Farhadi and his films are “set designing” and choosing the locations. “About Elly” and its stories happen in “Shomal”, the north Iran, that we have already written about it. But we don’t see Shomal in “About Elly”. Farhadi doesn’t show us the beauty of Shomal, while Iranians just go to Shomal to see its natural beauty. But Farhadi just shows us a very stupid ruined villa and the shores of the Caspian Sea, that we have already written about its horrible problems. What Farhadi shows us is not real Shomal. He could tell his stories, and at the same time he could show us Shomal and its beauty, and it this way, “About Elly” would have become a good film. Many Iranian filmmakers stupidly think that dirty shots and dirty scenes mean “art” ! But the nice shots and nice scenes are art. In the films that are about the social problems and the reality, like Farhadi’s films, you should show the real things, both the beauty and the ugliness, in the nice shots. In ‘About Elly’, we can’t see Shomal as Iranians see it in their trips. Farhadi just shows us a few nice shots, and other shots and other things are dirty and stupid. We don’t see both the beauties and the environmental disasters of Shomal. We just see stupid things, not reality. The actors and their performance in “About Elly” and “Fireworks Wednesday” were good or even great, while the acting in “A Separation” was not good. In “A Separation”, only Razieh (Sareh Bayat) was good, and Hodjat (Shahab Hosseini), Razieh’s daughter (little girl), Nader’s father, and the judge were not bad. But others were not good. In “About Elly”, the casting and assigning the roles to the actors was so stupid. The forty-something man and twenty-something wife, or vice versa, was so stupid, specially when you say they were classmate. As some experts say, in “A Separation” the Mise En Scène (‘putting things in the picture’ or ‘arranging the frame’ that concerns the design and arrangement of the image) were stupid. Color is an important part of mise-en-scene in that it creates mood and atmosphere, but colors, and also Lighting, Framing, Shooting, etc are not good in this film. In Iran, more that 500,000 people went to cinema and watched this film. As we said before, the people have boycotted the Mullah cinema, and the average number of viewers of an Iranian films in the recent years is about 50,000. Those few people who go to cinema, want to see comic scenes and laugh, while “A Separation” was dark and tragic. I think the people were very very kind to Farhadi. I hope Farhadi will not disappoint the people, and defends them in the Oscar’s night. Many average Iranians like “About Elly” more than “A Separation”, because “About Elly” is a fun-filled drama of family and friends, and only 50% of it is dark and tragic. It had no Happy End. It had a Tragic End, but the people liked it because of its first 30 to 45 minutes. It’s so obvious that in Iran, that is full of horrible tragic things, the people badly need to be happy and laugh, and they don’t want to be sad and cry, at least when they watch film. It’s better if Iranian filmmakers and Farhadi can make more films like “Fireworks Wednesday” or “About Elly”, specially like its first 30 minutes that can make people happy. In “Fireworks Wednesday”, Rouhi, a young lower class girl, finds herself in the midst of a domestic dispute between a couple of middle class upwards. Mojdeh suspects that her husband is having an affair with with a woman (hairdresser) next door. She feels cheated and isolated and on the eve of their departure to another country. She is having a total breakdown. “Fireworks Wednesday” is not a fun-filled film like the first 45 minutes of “About Elly”, and is not as dark and tragic as “A Separation” or the last 60 minutes of “About Elly”, but in this film Farhadi is less conservative and shows many problems in today’s Iran, without torturing you, and it’s good. Of course, some Iranians say: “In this film, the ancient tradition of Persians, Chaharshanbe soori (“Fireworks Wednesday” or “Wednesday Feast” that we have already written about it [check Archive]), has been shown like a dangerous street riot throughout the film and the sound of explosions is heard in all scenes. Is this really all we have in “Chaharshanbe soori”?” No, it’s not all we have in Chaharshanbe soori. It’s not the whole truth, but many problems that Farhadi shows in this film are real problems.


The non-Iranians don’t know which parts of the life in “A Separation” is real and which parts are unreal. As we said before, Farhadi doesn’t tell big shameful lies in this film, but he has some stupid big mistakes in this film. For example, many think (and many non-Iranian film critics say) that Simin and Nadar are a couple of middle-class upwards ! But it’s totally wrong. Simin and Nadar are average people, like 80% of Iranians who live in the cities. Nadar works in a bank, that it’s a low level job in Iran. Some funny Iranians say: “When you can’t find any other work in Iran, you go to a bank and work for it” And Simin is a teacher, and it’s a common job in Iran. Some funny Iranians say: “The majority of young Iranians are university-educated people, and when they can’t find a proper job, they prefer to become teacher”. So, Simin and Nadar are a couple of middle-class downwards, not upwards. But some stupid dialogue in this film, about the rich and the poor, create misconception for non-Iranians. Rouhi in “Fireworks Wednesday” is a member of lower class, while Hodjat and Razieh (in “A Separation”) are not a couple of lower class, but they are poor middle-class. They have not any difference with Nader and Simin, and it’s a reality in Iran. Both Hodjat and Razieh are literate and modern (conservative), and Hodjat’s dialogue about the poor and the rich, is unreal. In fact, Nader, Simin, Hodjat, Razieh, and the teacher are members of the same social class in Iran, and I think what Hodjat says is what Farhadi wants to say to the outside world. For instance, when Hodjat says: ‘Why do you think we are animal or live like animals?’ it’s what Hodjat says to the outside world, not to Iranians. Hodjat has been bankrupted and that’s why he is so poor, but as a shoe-maker and a businessman in Bazaar, he and his friends earn more money than Simin, Nadar, and the teacher, and are richer than them !! It’s what the non-Iranians should know about this film. In fact, Razieh can become a teacher or work in a bank, and Hodjat can embezzle money or can earn good money by dirty tricks, and can become a member of upper class in Iran. It’s what often happens in today’s Iran ! Hodjat has enough potential to become a crook and embezzler, or a Basiji thug. He can earn good money. Many businessmen in Iran, earn money in this way. Anyway, I don’t know why Farhadi shows “electric fan” in Nader’s house, while it belongs to 30 years ago, not today. It’s stupid and unreal. And about “telling lie” as a social problem, we know that Iranians tell more lies, more than what Farhadi shows us in “A Separation”. Of course, Nader and his daughter and the people who hate telling lie, exist in Iran, but they are not in majority. “Fireworks Wednesday” is a better film about the problem of “telling lie” in Iran, and what you see in “Fireworks Wednesday” is the reality, and what the majority of Iranians do or see in their life. And about film’s title, some funny Iranians say: “Why the name of this film is ‘Nader and Simin, A Separation’, while this film is about Razieh and Nader” Anyway, despite all stupid mistakes, “A Separation” shows many true things. For example, about the daily life, or the role of women in the family. Iranians are not like Arabs, and even a very conservative religious woman like Razieh is not like Arabs. It’s very important. Razieh is a symbol of very conservative religious people in Iran, but even Razieh is not as stupid as the Arabs. Hodjat seems so stupid, but he is not idiot, and it’s the reality of today’s Iran. Nader is an ordinary man and a good guy that cares about his daughter and his family, even more than Simin who is the mother, and it’s part of the reality of today’s Iran. Nader or Simin are not in the majority in Iran and the world, but you can find many people like them in Iran and the world. Just some stupid Iranian expats and some stupid Americans can say: “Nader is a perfect man, but Where in the world do we find such ethereal men? In the middle east? I think not! How contradictory to reality! ” These stupid bastards know nothing about today’s Iran. The mass media have brainwashed them, and these stupid bastards can’t see how modern today’s Iranians are. And I think that’s why Farhadi put some special dialogue in Hodjat’s mouth (“Why do you think we live like animals?”). The non-Iranians know nothing about Iran and Iranians, and that’s why the Iranian filmmakers should try to show the Iran’s reality to the outside world.


In the, you can find some funny user comments about A Separation: “from Netherlands: Caught A Separation in Amsterdam last night, fully unprepared for its greatness. I hadn’t been swept off my feet for a while, but this Iranian Hitchcockian drama sucked us in for 2 hours and left us very, very impressed … from Stockholm, Sweden: And it comes from Iran. The first thing you read on the screen is ‘In the name of God’. Well, anyway it’s the best story, the best cutting, the best actors you’ve seen for long … from UK: this is one of the most heart breaking and real movies I have seen this year. you can not leave the movie for even 1 second and characters are such real ones that you start to put yourself in their position and think what would I do?” Unfortunately, the majority of the people in the West and the outside world have horrible misconceptions about Iran and Iranians. They don’t know there are many serious differences between the Iran’s regime and the Iran’s people, and between the private life and the public life in Iran. As we said before, the Mullahs and their thugs have occupied Iran, and now Iran is an occupied land. As we said before, Iran or Persia with more than 15,000 years history of civilization, is one of the main cradles of civilization in the world. The root of the culture and many other things in the West is Iran (Persia). And the majority of Iranians are not like the Mullahs and the Islamists. “About Elly” is really better than “A Separation”, and if you want to see an acceptable film about today’s Iran, you can see “About Elly”. The non-Iranians say: “The first thing you read on the screen is ‘In the name of God'” or “the Iranian women have Hejab (the veil) even in their homes”. But its what the Mullahs have imposed on the Iranian filmmakers. Many stupid things that you see in the Iranian films are result of the Mullah censorship and self-censorship, or what the Mullahs have imposed on the filmmakers. Inside their own houses, and in their private life, Iranians have not any difference with the people in the West, but the Iranian filmmakers are not allowed to show this fact. The conditions of the public life, for instance in the Iranian hospitals and the Iranian courts, are so horrible, more than what you see in “A Separation”. The Mullahs have destroyed many things in Iran. In the real life, Nader and Simin would talk about the horrible conditions in the stupid Islamic courts, the detentions, the hospitals, etc. But in this film, you don’t see the reality. In the real life, the courts, the judge, the soldiers, etc are not as kind as what Farhadi shows us. The bribery and horrible corruption is what Farhadi doesn’t show us. In the real life, Nader, after going to the detention and the court, would decide to leave Iran as soon as possible ! But in this film you can’t see the reality. Some funny Iranians say: “In Iran, you should always pray to God and ask him that you don’t go to any court or any hospital in Iran”. The situation in the courts and the hospitals is really so horrible. But the Mullahs don’t allow the filmmakers to show the real social problems. The dirty and stupid state buildings, the rude and stupid judges, soldiers, nurses, etc, in addition to the widespread corruption, are part of the public life in Iran. It’s what the Mullahs have created it and want to hide it. Farhadi doesn’t tell you why Simin want to leave Iran, while it’s very important. Farhadi doesn’t tell the truth about many things, because the Mullahs don’t allow it. This level of self-censorship and conservativeness in “A Separation” annoys many Iranians. It’s so ridiculous that Farhadi deliberately doesn’t talk about many serious issues. Farhadi just try to avoid telling big shameful lies, but even this level of self-censorship has made the savage Mullahs angry. Anyway, If you want to see a better version of “A Separation”, you should watch “Fireworks Wednesday”. And if you want to watch a good film about today’s Iranians, you should watch the first 30 minutes of “About Elly”.

Golden Globe 2012 and Asghar Farhadi

January 16, 2012

“Asghar Farhadi’s drama ‘A Separation’ won the best foreign language film award at the 69th Golden Globes on Sunday”, the media reported. Asghar Farhadi is a young Iranian filmmaker that is more important and talented than someone like Abbas Kiarostami that Iranians call him “Abbas Khayemal (Ass-kisser)” because he kisses the Mullahs’ ass. The media added: “Accepting his award, Farhadi thanked his cast, crew, producers and distributors. ‘When I was coming up on stage, I was thinking what I should say here,’ he said, ‘I prefer to say something about my people. They are a truly peace-loving people.’ Standing on stage, next to Farhadi, was actor/ writer Peyman Moaadi who portrays Nader in ‘A Separation’. Farhadi was one of the winners at 17th annual Critics Choice Awards (for Best Foreign Language Film), too”.


The nominations for Best Foreign Language Film in the 69th Golden Globe were: The Flowers Of War (China), In The Land of Blood and Honey (USA), The Kid With a Bike (Belgium), A Separation (Iran), and The Skin I Live In (Spain). The media reported: “A Separation is the first Iranian film that win a Golden Globe. Beating Angelina Jolies ‘In the Land of Honey and Blood’ and Pedro Almodovars ‘The Skin I Live in’, A Separation has a good chance of winning this years Oscar”. In the past two years, Farhadi has defended the Iranian movement, in Berlin Film Festival, in France, in “House of Cinema Festival”, etc. Farhadi has not betrayed the people yet. He has defended the Iranian anti-Mullah movement. But now in the US, he has refused to support the people movement. In fact, in the recent months he has begun to become more conservative, and now he is on the edge of becoming Khayemal (ass-kisser).


The 69th Golden Globe Awards were held on Sunday night in Los Angeles at the Beverly Hilton Hotel. Woody Allen won the Best Screenplay award for “Midnight in Paris”. Meryl Streep won the Best Actress award (Drama) for “The Iron Lady”. Martin Scorsese won the Best Director award for “Hugo”. George Clooney won the Best Actor award (Drama) for “The Descendants”. “The Descendants” won the Best Drama award, and “The Artist” won the Best Comedy award. You can find the full list of the nominations and winners in Golden Globe’s official website. It’s funny to know that some stupid or unimportant details can be important in Iran. Farhadi and Moaadi’s clothes were appropriate and normal, but it has angered the savage Mullahs, because they believe “wearing tie or bow tie is non-Islamic”. Fardahi shook Angelina Jolie’s hands, and it’s quite normal. But some say why he didn’t shake her hands warmly, while the savage Mullahs say why he shook a woman’s hand, specially Jolie’s hands. I don’t know why he didn’t shake Jolie’s hands warmly with two hands. Maybe he is frightened of the Mullahs. Maybe, it’s part of his personality. But it’s a personal matter, and unimportant matter. It’s none of our business. But what Farhadi would say in the Oscar’s night, if he wins the Oscar, will be important for many Iranians.


Farhadi is on the edge of becoming Khayemal (ass-kisser). Iranians will call him “Asghar Khayemal”, if he kisses the Mullahs’ ass or says any positive thing about the Mullah regime. And the people will be disappointed at him, if he remains silent and conservative. He can use the Oscar’s night to defend the ordinary Iranians and their movement. He should talk about the martyrs and the victims. Iranians are alone and voiceless. Everybody betrays them. But the Oscar’s night is a rare opportunity to support them. Farhadi can give a good speech that night. As we said before, the vast majority of Iranian filmmakers and Iranian celebrities are Khayemal (ass-kisser). They are opportunist, charlatan, and sycophant. Until now, Farhadi has been among the rare exceptions, and many hope he doesn’t become “Asghar Khayemal” in the near future. Almost all casts and crews of his film, “Separation of Nader and Simin”, are Khayemal. Maybe only “Leila Hatami” (Simin) or “Moaadi” (Nader) can be among the exceptions. Unfortunately, when Iranian celebrities become more famous, they become more Khayemal, too.


I’ve heard good and bad things about “A Separation”, that its full name is “Separation of Nader and Simin” or “Nader and Simin, A Separation”. I’ve not seen this film yet, but other Farhadi’s films were not bad. Of course, they were not good, too. “ChaharShanbe Soori” (Wednesday Feast) and “About Elly” are not bad films. I liked some scenes of ‘About Elly’, but the whole film was not good. Many things in this film were stupid. Of course, ‘About Elly’ was better than almost all Iranian movies in the recent years, but it doesn’t mean that ‘About Elly’ is a good film. I liked “ChaharShanbe Soori” (Wednesday Feast), more than “About Elly”. As you know, the Mullahs censor many things and don’t allow the Iranian filmmakers to make their own films, and that’s why almost all Iranian films are shitty, horrible, or unacceptable. The lack of basic freedoms, the horrible censorship, the self-censorship, and the Khayemali (kissing ass) are among the main obstacles in the way of all Iranians, including the Iranian filmmakers.


The young Iranian filmmakers are much more talented than someone like “Abbas Khayemal”. Asghar Farhadi is just one of the young Iranian filmmakers who can become global filmmakers, if they refuse to kiss the Mullahs’ ass, and if they could make their own films without the Mullah censorship and other restrictions that the Mullahs impose on them. Iranians have many unknown good filmmakers, and if you want one name, I can give you the name of “Hojjat Ghasemzadeh Asl”, who has four TV films, that are much more better than Farhadi’s works. The works of some young and unknown Iranian filmmakers, like “Ghasemzadeh Asl”, are “global artifacts”, at least much more than Farhadi’s works. The freedom, specially freedom of speech and freedom from censorship and suffocation, is necessary for making any good work. Many Iranians can’t work because the savage Mullahs don’t allow them or because they don’t want to kiss the Mullahs’ ass, and that’s why the majority of young Iranian intellectuals, writers, artists, filmmakers, philosophers, thinkers, etc are unknown. But after the Mullahs, the world will hear more about them.

[P.S. In the above pix, the person that some tell funny jokes about his taste in clothing, is Pedro Almodovar, the most famous Spanish filmmaker]

Black Comedy: Anything Else (2003)

December 27, 2011

Anything Else (2003) is a black comedy film by Woody Allen, and like other black comedies, it’s a comedy about the tragedy of life and the horrible problems. What the critics said about this film was very negative, but I give it 8/10. Anything Else is not a masterpiece, but it’s a good movie. Some say: “We read a lot of reviews saying that Woody is just repeating himself, but you know what? It doesn’t matter.” In fact, many things just repeat over and over: the love stories, the tragedies, the problems, the life, the death, the relationships, etc. It’s part of the human life. Anything Else, like other Allen’s movies, is about existential issues, human relationships, problems of relationships, the deceit, paranoia and delusions, childlike adults, frustration, commitment, etc. Again neurotic couples doing many neurotic things. But everyone is a little neurotic. This film is about the life and the problems of a young writer, Jerry Falk (Jason Biggs). Jerry’s problems with a new crazy girlfriend, Amanda (Christina Ricci) and her crazy mother, and his relations with a crazy writer, Dobel (Woody Allen), and also a crazy manager/ agent (De Vito) is like a true story. Amanda is a crazy and annoying girlfriend who is complex, difficult, uninterested in s-e-x for months, unfaithful, and her crazy mother is moving in with them. Woody Allen himself plays the older teacher, David Dobel, who gives lots of wise and crazy advice to Jerry. He is “a crazy wise old man”. In an interview about his life, Woody Allen was asked: “if there is one of your films that tells us the most about your philosophy of life?” And he answered: “Well, to date-if it’s just that-I would probably say Anything Else. In terms of just me personally as a kind of wretched little complaining vantz, I think you would see that in Anything Else. There’s a lot of me in there. I’m not saying that Anything Else is my best film, although, I didn’t think it was a bad film at all- I think that one is better than many films of mine that were more successful. I won’t say that it’s never the case, but very often there’s no correlation between the quality of one’s work artistically and its commercial success. Everybody knows that” In fact, Woody Allen and his real life is a combination of Jerry Falk and David Dobel, but who can be perfect? everyone has his own problems and stupidities. Anything Else is a good typical Woody Allen film, with a lot of paranoia and irony. There are many memorable scenes in this film.


Anything Else was awful at the US box office, like most of Woody Allen’s films, grossed only $3 million. Some say: “As has become common with Allens films, it performed better overseas, grossing $10 million, but could not make back its $18 million shooting budget or the $10 million Dreamworks spent marketing the film. However, the reception was not entirely negative; in 2009, it was cited by Quentin Tarantino as one of his favorite 20 films since 1992”. It’s a modern movie with a typical Woody Allen style dialogue. It’s full of great dialogue. Falk: ‘Do you love me?’ Amanda: ‘What a question. Just because I pull away when you touch me?’ … Dobel: ‘The pill makes her crazy? Falk, she is crazy. The Pentagon should use her hormones for chemical warfare‘ … Dobel: ‘I promised students of my class I’m gonna take them to the Caravaggio exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum. You know, I try to give them a little culture now and then so they don’t beat each other to death with bicycle chains all the time‘. Woody Allen uses his old material in this movie, like a paranoid Jew. His jokes about the stupid Jews make many fanatic Jews angry, but many wise Jews love him and his jokes. Woody Allen’s movies deal with everyday urban life of the middle class intellectuals, artists, writers, etc. with all their love, s-e-x, professional, personal, and philosophical problems. Anything Else is one of these films, and it shows us part of the unseen facts about the daily life in the US and New York. It’s interesting to know that Anything Else and other Allen’s movies can show you part of our life in Iran, too. You can see almost all characters of Anything Else and other Allen’s movies in today’s Iran. In fact, these characters are universal characters and their problems are universal problems. Amanda’s mother is a childlike mother that almost all Iranians have someone like her among their relatives. This childlike crazy mother is really a global character that you can find her everywhere. Jerry’s agent, Harvey, is an old man that lives with his mother and charges Jerry 25 percent, while the standard is 10%, but Jerry is his only client. Harvey is an uneducated businessman, an ex-salesman in the clothing industry, that has become agent of a young writer. Americans call him ‘loser’, but he is just ‘a wrong man in a wrong place’. It’s a familiar character in all around the world.


Amanda seems like an annoying girlfriend who cheats on her boyfriend, but she clearly talks about her problem with commitment and sends enough signal to Jerry, who is naive and blind. When Dobel says: “Amanda is cheating on you”. Jerry asks: “How do you know? You just see her for minutes” Dobel: “I see it in her eyes”. He advises Jerry to spy on her. When Jerry finds the truth, he asks Amanda: “I saw three of you. You, your acting teacher, and your diaphragm. Where could be your diaphragm? There is no such thing as a diaphragm repair shop.’ Amanda: ‘Okay. Okay, I slept with Ron Keller (acting teacher). But I didn’t do it because I care about him‘. Falk: No? What then? To punish him?‘ Amanda: ‘No, I did it because I had to find out if there was something wrong with me. Because I can’t sleep with you, the person that I love. I had to know if I was some kind of freak, or frigid. I had to know if I could even get aroused anymore and have an orgasm’. Falk: ‘And can you?’ Amanda: ‘Yeah. It’s good news. I can‘. Amanda: “Don’t be mad at Ron. He was just trying to help” Jerry: ‘Remind me, please, to put him on my Christmas list, if I could figure out how to make a letter bomb‘. Jerry: ‘OK. Where’s the rifle? I need the rifle. I’m going to blow my brains out!’ Amanda: ‘Oh, don’t be so middle class! I did it as much for you as for me‘ Girls like Amanda, and Boys like Jerry, do exist everywhere, in the US, Iran, and everywhere. What Amanda says about herself in the flash back, is a black joke about the ethical values and the hypocrisy in today’s world. Jerry’s girlfriend: “Where did you go to school?” Amanda :” Ethical culture . Fieldstone. But I dropped out.” Amanda’s boyfriend: “One of the professors fall in love with her” Amanda: “It was terrible. He was married. It was way too much pressure for all of us. His poor wife.” Amanda’s character and the jokes that Woody Allen’s has written about her in the script is like the Iranian jokes (the Rashti jokes). When Amanda came back from a 2-weeks trip to Italy with a man, she confesses: “Yah, I did it. But I thought of you. You were really the person I was really making love to in Naples and Florence, and Venice, and on the airplane 40,000 feet in the air, and … ” Jerry: “OK. Enough.” Amanda: “And at the Vatican”. There are many universal black jokes in this film. Woody Allen’s jokes about the stupid drug users and snorting cocaine, that is as funny as the similar jokes in “Hannah and Her Sisters”, is universal, and the scenes about the thugs in New York, remind you of a global problem, and this fact that ultra-stupid people are everywhere.


Anything Else is a black comedy. It forces you to think about many things, including the tragedy of life. It’s not a comedy and happy movie that you can watch it when you are depressed or unhappy. But it’s a movie about global issues. Jerry and Dobel go to the Central Park in New York and talk about the life and their problems. It’s like what many Iranians and other people in all around the world do. Dobel’s dialogue and theories are great. Dobel: ‘Last night I was home alone in my apartment and I conjured up a threesome with me, Marilyn Monroe and Sophia Loren, and it was very very erotic. As a matter of fact if I’m not mistaken, it was the first time those two great actresses ever appeared in anything together“. Dobel: “I was married when I was young. I should have known something was wrong on the wedding night, when her family danced around my table chanting: ‘We will make him one of us“. Jerry’ shrink is a typical idiot you can find him everywhere. Dobel says: “Since the beginning of time people have been, you know, frightened and, and unhappy, and they’re scared of death, and they’re scared of getting old, and there’s always been priests around, and shamans, and now shrinks, to tell ’em, “Look, I know you’re frightened, but I can help you. Of course, it is going to cost you a few bucks…” But they can’t help you, because life is what it is”. Woody Allen’s jokes with the doctors are funny, specially about the relation between Amanda and the unknown doctor. Jerry: “The doctor had better s-e-x examining her than I’ve had in six months’. Dobel’s medical theories is as funny as his stupid theories about the end of time and the end of world and the end of civilization. Dobel: “I have a theory that too much rejections (by partner) causes cancer.” Anything Else is a black comedy that can show you many things and many issues are universal. In fact, Anything Else is a movie that can show you how similar are the human life in all around the world. When you make a movie, or write a book or article, or create any arts work or intellectual work about the existential issues, the human life, or the human problems, you are a global creator and your work is a universal artifact. Anything Else is one of these universal artifacts.

Best Movies: “Cinema Paradiso” (1989)

December 10, 2011

Nuovo Cinema Paradiso (New Paradise Cinema), internationally released as “Cinema Paradiso”, is an Italian comedy drama film written and directed by Giuseppe Tornatore. I think Cinema Paradiso is a masterpiece, a 9/10 movie, that Tornatore made it in 1988, at the age of 32. It’s about a famous film director, Salvatore (Toto), and his life in Italy, specially his childhood in 1950s and 1960s. The Iranian society has many similarities with the Italian society, and “Cinema Paradiso” can be considered as a film about Iran and the Iranian society, too. After receiving news about the death of an old friend (Alfredo), Toto remembers his childhood as a smart son of a war widow in a Sicilian town and at the Cinema Paradiso where Alfredo, the projectionist, treated him as his son. Told in a flashback, Salvatore reminiscences about his childhood and his relationship with Alfredo. Under the fatherly influence of Alfredo, Toto falls in love with film and cinema, and learn many things. The film was originally released in Italy at 155 minutes, but poor box office performance led to it being shortened to 120 minutes for international release. This international version won many awards, from Oscar and Golden Globe to Cannes and BAFTA. In 2002, the director’s cut 175-minute version was released, that was a masterpiece. The Mullah TV has showed it once, in about 80 minutes ! that was quite nonsense, a collection of unrelated scenes. But the three-hour international director’s cut (175 minutes) is really a masterpiece. It’s a story about friendship, love, cinema, people, humanity, religion, censorship, Italian society, history, and many other things. The priest that censors the movies is like the Mullahs, and the atmosphere inside the cinema and the small town is like what you could see in Iran in the past decades. In the several scenes of the movies being shown in the cinema, there is frequent booing from the audience, during the “censored” sections. The films suddenly jump, missing a kiss or embrace. In fact, the local priest, that is like a moderate Mullah, has ordered that these sections be cut out. The film attempts to educate the “outsider” not familiar with Italian society after the world war II. You can watch it again and again and see more and more details that pertain to the people and the history.


The uncut Cinema Paradiso is more than anything else about life and the effect of the decisions we make . Alfredo, a wise but illiterate guy whose life has been wasted by the stupidities of his time and his stupid town, tries to prevent Toto from wasting his life and making stupid decisions. In one of the best scenes, Alferedo advises Toto and says : “Get out of here! Go to Rome. You’re young and the world is yours. I’m old. I don’t want to hear you talk anymore. I want to hear others talking about you. Don’t come back. Don’t think about us. Don’t look back. Don’t write. Don’t give in to nostalgia. Forget us all. If you do and you come back, don’t come see me. I won’t let you in my house. Understand? Whatever you end up doing, love it. The way you loved the projection booth when you were a little squirt.” It’s what many wise Iranians tell their children or the youth in today’s Iran, about leaving Iran and its Mullah hell. But unfortunately, many who leave Iran become stupider than Iranians inside Iran. Maybe Alfredo’s advise is only good and helpful for the wise and smart guys, not for everybody. Anyway, Alfredo also adds: “Living here day by day, you think it’s the center of the world. You believe nothing will ever change. Then you leave: a year, two years. When you come back, everything’s changed. You have to go away for a long time, many years , before you can come back and find your people, and the land where you were born. Right now you’re blinder than I am. Toto: ‘Who said that? Gary Cooper? James Stewart? Henry Fonda?’ Alfredo: ‘No, Toto. Nobody said it. This time it’s all me. Life isn’t like in the movies. Life, is much harder“. What Alfredo says about love, that changes Toto’s life, can be very helpful for many youths: “Out of the fire of love come ashes. Even the greatest love eventually fizzles out”. Some critics say: “This film makes you laugh and makes you cry, yet it is so simple and straightforward. There is no Hollywood superstars, no special effects, just pure emotions and feelings, love, fear, grief and regret, nostalgia for childhood and youth, memories of places and times that will not come back, memories of the loved ones. This movie is there to affect your feelings.”


The three-hour international director’s cut (175 Minutes), is a masterpiece. Divided into three sections, the first section is about little Toto and Alfredo. One of the best scenes is Toto’s face as he watches the footage that will be censored by the town priest. The second section shows Toto as a youth, when he falls in love with Elena. The story of relationship between Toto and Elena, and her parent reactions, and many other things reminds Iranians of today’s Iran and yesterday’s Iran. In the final section, Salvatore, now a great film director, returns to his town after 30 years to attend Alfredo’s funeral. Salvatore’s reunion with Elena, Salvatore’s reunion with his mother, beside seeing his sister and the old people and old friends, shows us the bitter truth, the tragedy of life, and also the depth of Alfredo’s wisdom. The audience inside the cinema Paradiso are great. The man who only goes to the cinema to sleep and is always awoken by kids, the thugs and mobs, the priest who censors the movies, the couple who see each other for the first time, the fascist who spits on others, the couple who make love in the cinema, the prostitute who works in the cinema, and the people, specially the kids and the youth, who scare, laugh, boo, or masturbate, and many other things are interesting. Ennio Morricone’s music is great, and it’s really hard to find a serious weak point in the film. Alfredo complains and says: “Progress always comes late”, and it’s what many say in Iran and all around the world. ‘Progress always comes late’, but disasters and tragedies always come soon. And it’s part of the tragedy of life. If you want to see a good movie about the human life, and how similar the humans and their life are in all around the world, you can watch “Cinema Paradiso”.

Helen Mirren, Children, and Honesty

November 28, 2011

Recently, the famous British actress, Helen Mirren, 66, had an interview with the Observer, and talked about her controversial life and why she has not any children. It’s not bad we take a look at Mirren’s life and some important global problems. Helen Mirren has won an Academy Award, four SAG Awards, four BAFTAs, three Golden Globes, four Emmy Awards, and two Cannes Awards. Mirren was a rebel and started her career as an actress in 1965, at age 20. She says: “Im a would-be rebel -the good girl whod like to be a bad one. Im still the good girl who wants to be a bad girl. But Ill never make it as a bad girl. Im not a moralist and I never have been, but Im too fearful, too much of a wimp, really”. Helen Mirren, like other humans, has had great mistakes or weak points (like using drugs), but she has not been cheap and nasty like many other celebrities. Once she had said: “I am so happy that I didn’t have children. Well, you know, because I’ve had freedom”. And in the recent interview she has said: “The children are funny, but I never wanted to have them. There are far too many people in the world. It is my contribution to ecology “! Mirren has been honest with herself about many things. Some say: “Helen Mirren is not irresponsible and stupid; she has decided for herself and her life honestly and thoughtfully. You should know that there is a trade-off between s-e-x-u-al freedom and children, if you want to be honest and responsible and enjoy s-e-x-u-al freedom”. Many people, in Iran and the west, are really charlatan and live an animal life. They are unfaithful partner and totally irresponsible parent. According to a Persian old saying: “They want to have both date and donkey” (hamm Khar and hamm Khorma), that in this case means they want to enjoy the benefits of having family and children, but they also try to live like a single boy or girl and are totally irresponsible and dishonest. But Mirren is not like them. And some say: “that’s why she still is famous and attractive at age 66, after 46 years continuous work as an actress”


In the recent interview, Helen Mirren said: “I think some men and women just don’t have a deep urge to procreate. It’s funny, I was watching this program on TV last night, Two Greedy Italians, and one of them announced: ‘The most important things in life are food and procreation.’ Well for me, neither of those things is centrally important. The children are funny, and I just love them, but I never wanted to have them. I really tried to want it at one point. I thought maybe I should. But I never convinced myself. I think still it is very fine not to want children. There are far too many people in the world. It is my contribution to ecology. You write your life story by the choices you make. You never know if they have been a mistake. Those moments of decision are so difficult. I went through a phase of consulting the I Ching, which was useful in that it freed you up to listen to your instinct. Though often it would say things such as, ‘The water will pour down from the mountain and the sea will churn’ and you had to make of it what you wanted to. I don’t think I have slept in the same bed for more than 3 or 4 months my whole life. I am always planting vegetables that I never get to eat and flowers that I never see. I have always moved around the world. What I have learned is that you come more to accept that you are never going to get it right. For any kind of artist, your whole life is a struggle to be free in your art form. I know now that you never get there. But you do get as close as you can”. As you know, food and procreation are the most important things for animals and the animal life. And the wise humans try to have a human life. They think about many things, specially about the dilemma of creating another human for living in this shitty world. But unfortunately, many still live like animals and can’t understand that creating a new baby is equal to the greatest possible responsibility. And the poor and innocent babies are victims of these stupid bastards who convert the human society into an animal colony with many horrible animal problems. Just take a look at Africa, Asia, America, and even Europe, and see the dreadful conditions of children and how many humans still live like animals. The world will be a better place, only when the number of irresponsible and stupid humans who live like animals decreases significantly.


Helen Mirren has added: “I learned quite early on in life that we are all two people. And one of those people none of us will ever know. Acting is a great deal to do with accepting that other person and coming to terms with her. You can’t control how other people see you or think of you. But you have to be comfortable with that. You didn’t encounter that s-e-x-ism so much in the theatre, but it was a norm of everyday life … I was also my own worst enemy to a certain extent. I was into girlie things and also what I would call eroticism as art; I had a relationship with a photographer [James Wedge] and explored that. I never saw a conflict in those things. Your personal dignity seems a separate thing from that to me. And it is a question of taste. To this day, I still can’t quite explain why one thing is vulgar and one thing is not, but I know for sure which is which. [Mirren was famous early in her film career for her apparently relaxed attitude to nudity] If I catch a glimpse of myself in “Age of Consent” [above and below pictures], with James Mason, the first film I did, it is a bit, ‘Wow! Who is that funny little hairy fat girl? [!]’ It is a different person [!]. Every cell in your body is different. It’s not really you at all … My father very much wanted to assimilate. He wanted a British family and not to live in the past as his father had done. But however hard he tried, my father was Russian in his heart. He spoke Russian but he didn’t want to. And he certainly didn’t want us to. He was a socialist”. Some say: “What Helen Mirren says about her early films is not acceptable and is a sign of hypocrisy or stupidity”. But some add: “what she says about her early films or her past can be understandable, because we and our views change during our life, and it’s progress”.


Of her scandalous early roles in 1969s Age of Consent (when she stripped as the teenage muse of an older painter) or in Caligula (1979), Mirren says she had a plan. She says: When I did Caligula, for example, I hadnt really done movies. And she adds, I much prefer overt s-e-x-uality to sleazy, vulgar prurience”. In fact, from the scandal-plagued Caligula (1979) and “Age of Consent” (1969) to the controversial “The Cook, The Thief, His Wife & Her Lover” (1989) and “The Calendar Girls” (2003), she always has been very controversial or notorious, but she says: “I love being notorious. Of course, Im getting less notorious as I get older. People forget that I ever was”. Mirren’s story is the story of the censorship in the UK, too. In 1960s, as soon as she left college, she was a rising star at the RSC whod begun her repertoire of provocative film roles with 1969s Age of Consent, that ran into trouble with censors in the UK. Just after 35 years, both the original score and cut scenes were reinstated when the film was restored in 2005. Some say: “Mirren was 22 at the time the filming of Age of Consent began, but even now at age 66 she still is very controversial and has many fans.” And some adds: “She has had many problems or mistakes. But she has been honest. She has not cheated on any body. She has no children and no responsibility for her children. She enjoys her freedom without telling lie and being irresponsible.” Honesty is an important human value. Some claims that almost half of Britain’s women cheat on their partners. And it’s a big global problem. In fact, being hypocrite and dishonest is equal to being a stupid bastard politician, and we know what the stupid bastard politicians do with the world. Some Iranians say: “In Iran, more than half of Iranian men and women cheat on their partners, and have extramarital affairs. They tell blatant lies, and destroy the life of their children while they should be responsible about their children.” It’s ridiculous that many of these unfaithful and hypocrite bastards say that some one like Helen Mirren is corrupt !! These stupid bastards are like the hypocrite Mullahs who kill, torture, and rape men and women, but arrest the youths for Hejab or having GF/ BF, in the name of the Moral Values !


Last year the media reported: “At 65, Helen Mirren is also that rare thing: an actress who has kept both her body and her career hot without going under the knife. She describes a recent encounter in Los Angeles with two women who had evidently indulged in some cosmetic enhancements. Their lips made them look like huge platypuses or ducks or something, Mirren says, turning her own lips inside out to illustrate. I went: God, look at those two Los Angeles women! And I heard them talking and they both had complete British accents! I do think people should do whatever makes them happy. Even those ladies with those ridiculous lips. If they look at themselves in the mirror and they go: Wow! I look good! So what? It again shows that Mirren is not too stupid. If you were honest with yourself and wanted to have plastic surgery for being more happy, what can be wrong with that? It can be a sign of wisdom. But if you were a sheep who wanted to have plastic surgery because it’s in fashion or because others do it, it’s really stupid. It’s a clear sign of “Foolishness Disease”. It’s really shameful that the number of hypocrite and dishonest people in the whole world is large. The people who are like a sheep, and tell lie and are unfaithful, dishonest and irresponsible, and then justify themselves by blaming others or the world, are really stupid bastards. They often blame the free and independent people for being corrupt, while themselves are the most corrupt people in the world. They are dishonest, unfaithful, and irresponsible, and make humans’ life hell. In the recent years, the number of hypocrite and dishonest people in Iran has increased dramatically . It’s one of the main Mullah miracle in Iran, but the ordinary Iranians should try to not justify themselves by only blaming the Mullahs. Being honest and wise is a matter of personal choice. You can be wise and honest even in the dreadful conditions. Some Iranians say: “If you regularly cheat on your wife or husband, if you have extramarital affairs while you have children, if you have married because your wife or your husband were rich, and if you are a big liar who tell lie to everyone including your family and your close friends, you are a stupid jerk who deserves to be fucked by both the Mullahs and the hypocrite western politicians.” It’s really true. You can not be dishonest, unfaithful, liar, asshole and jerk, and then ask : “Why does the world has many f-u-c-k-ing problems ?” In fact, You, yourself are part of the damn problems.

Abbas Khayemal (Kiarostami), Taghvai, Vafamehr

November 12, 2011

Recently, Abbas Kiarostami that we and many other Iranians call him “Abbas Kayemal” (Abbas Ass-kisser) has opened his damn mouth and talked nonsense about our situation in Iran. Unfortunately many non-Iranians think “Abbas Kiarostami is one of the great filmmakers of our time.” But it’s a stupid joke. Abbas Kayemal is just a great ass-kisser and a worthless Iranian baboon and the stupid French made him a straw hero. In his recent interview, on October 13, 2011, with a German radio (search web for “Kiarostami ,, dkultur”) he has told stupid joke about his shitty films, but his funnier joke is about our situation in Iran. The German interviewer ask him: “Our listeners might expect, that you comment on the current situation in Iran”. And Abbas Kayemal say: “What angers me, is the West’s reaction to Panahi’s arrest, and also the reaction of Panahi himself. Now, Panahi is free; he has even made a movie that was shown at Cannes [!!!!] [what this jerk talks about is a 2-minute short film!]. I just do not understand why they tell lie [!!]. It annoys me that the West does not seem to acknowledge that he is no longer in prison. And that’s why I react so annoying. The simple truth is that Panahi is no longer in custody”. Abbas Kayemal is really a worthless jerk. He doesn’t talk about what happened to Panahi in jail; He doesn’t say that the Mullahs have officially declared that Panahi can’t make film for 20 years; He doesn’t say that Panahi’s crime was “Film Making”! He doesn’t talk about other film makers that have been arrested recently, and about the majority of film makers that can’t make film in Iran. Abbas Kayemal is really a worthless jerk who only kisses the Mullah’s ass and works as an apologist for the savage Mullahs. In the recent weeks, the Mullahs have arrested many Iranian film makers, but Abbas Kayemal talks nonsense and defends the Mullah regime. He doesn’t say anything about the arrested film makers and arrested actresses, especially about Nasser Taghvai’s wife, Marzieh Vafamehr.


Iranians know that in the recent weeks the media reported: “Marzieh Vafamehr, an Iranian actress sentenced to 90 lashes and a year in prison after appearing in Iranian film “My Tehran for Sale”. One scene in the film shows her without Islamic Hejab (the head-covering Iranian women are forced to wear), while she appears to drink alcohol in another. “My Tehran for Sale” is a short film that an Iranian expat has made it as her thesis for an Australian university. The actress, Marzieh Vafamehr, seems to have been released after about two months in jail, and after an appeal court reduced her imprisonment to three months and overturned the flogging sentence”. In the recent weeks, more than 20 film makers, specially the documentary film makers, were arrested too. But Abbas Khayemal, not only shut his f-u-c-k-ing mouth about this matter, but he works as an apologist for the Mullah regime! Shame on you, Abbas Khayemal. The world should know that Abbas Khayemal is a worthless baboon. And it’s not the first time that he shows his true colors. In the past years, Abbas Khayemal has shown his true colors over and over. In 2005, he said: “I support Mr. shit; I vote for Mr. shit”. And in 2009, when the Mullahs were killing and raping Iranians, Abbas Khayemal defended the Mullah regime, and said Mr. shit and Mullahs are as bad as the world thinks! Now almost all Iranians know that Abbas Khayemal is a worthless Iranian baboon. Some ask: “Why the west only cares about the Iranian baboons and Iranian jerks? Abbas Kayemal is a worthless baboon with many shitty and worthless films. He only kisses the savage Mullahs’ ass, and Iranians hate him.” Nasser Taghvai is an Iranian film maker (director & screenwriter) that is more talented than Abbas Khayemal, but the west doesn’t care about him, because he is independent and anti-Mullah, and doesn’t kiss the Mullah’s ass. Of course, Taghvai and many other Iranian film makers have serious weak points, but some young Iranian artists are very talented. If Iran was a free country, the young anti-Mullah artists would show the world that they are much more talented than Abbas Khayemal, whose fate would be like the fate of Nazi, Fascist, or Stalinist film makers. Now, the people only spit on their graves, and the world has forgotten them.


Recently, Taghvai’s ex-wife, Shahrnoosh ParsiPour, has said: “I met Vafamehr in Turkey. She was a nice girl, very nice girl. I loved her. Vafamehr was more younger than our son (son of Taghvai & ParsiPour), but she was a real mother for my son. I mean, she can be a good mother for my son, while she is younger than him”. This kind of sarcastic comments is quite normal among Iranians, especially Iranian women! But some funny Iranians say: “You can call Nasser Taghvai “Nasser Hashari” (Nasser Horny), because when he met Vafamehr, he was (about) 50 and she was (about) 20. Apparently, Nasser Hashari (only) kisses the women’s ass, but it can be quite normal. You can call Nasser Taghvai “Nasser Shireie” (Nasser Opium), because apparently he loves opium. Of course, it’s a serious weak point, but he has not kissed the Mullahs’ ass; and that’s the important matter. In fact, being horny is much more better than being ass-kisser”. So, that’s why many Iranians say: “Sage Taghvai be Kiarostami sharaf dareh” (even Taghvai’s dog is more honorable than Kiarostami). Unfortunately, Abbas Khayemal and his stupid tragic story is just another tragicomedy in Iran’s history; It’s part of the tragedy of Iranian intellectualism and the tragedy of Iranian fake intellectuals. “The world should know Abbas Khayemal and his true color, and they should not care about him”, many Iranians say in these days. And many add: “Abbas Khayemal, Tu un Ruhe Akhound Parastet (Damn you, the Mullah lover, Abbas Khayemal)”. In fact, Abbas Khayemal is worst than the Islamist film makers, and some one like Ebrahim Hatamikia, who recently has kissed the Mullahs’ ass. Some one like Hatamikia is a Basiji baboon and doesn’t pretend that he is an intellectual. Everybody knows that Hatamikia is a Khayemal and a Mullah lover. But Abbas Khayemal is a charlatan who has tried to deceive the world and public opinion, or as Iranians say: “He tries to eat from both the manger and the nose-bag“. Abbas Khayemal is really an Iranian baboon and a fake intellectual, and the world should know it.

Halloween, Mean Girls Style !

November 2, 2011

Halloween is a Christian/Western holiday on October 31, the night before All Saints Day. As we said before, many believe that the ancient festival of Iranians, ChaharShanbeh Soori, is the root of Halloween. Typical festive Halloween activities, include trick-or-treating, carving jack-o’-lanterns, lighting bonfires, playing pranks, telling scary stories, ghost-spirit things, etc are like what Iranians (Persians), do in ChaharShanbe Soori since the ancient time. But in the recent decades, Halloween has changed, and now many ask: “Oh, we can’t understand. Halloween is s-e-x-y or scary?”


In fact, Halloween has become “The Mean Girls Halloween”. What mean girls said in “Mean Girls”(2004) movie was joke, but it’s the heart of today Halloween: “In the regular world, Halloween is when you dress up like a zombie, or children dress up in costumes and beg for candy. But in Girl World, Halloween is the one night a year when a girl can dress up like a total slut, and others (your parents, friends, etc) can not say anything about it” In fact, “Mean Girls Style” explains how girls can dress like a slut on Halloween.


Many take Mean Girls advice seriously, specially those who love the fashion and the fashion world. Of course, some still believe: “The combination of short skirts, low shirts and polyester-spandex mix will only make you look and feel cheap”. But those who love exposing themselves, body painting, or having fun, only laugh at these views. They are creating a new Halloween. In fact, recently Halloween is about s-e-x before it is about “trick or treat” or ghosts, zombies, etc.


Some say: “The s-e-x-y costume is now as much a part of Halloween as candy corn and Tootsie Rolls. Provocative dress seems like a modern phenomenon. The second half of the 20th century, especially since 1970s, is when you see an explosion of adult costumes. It was also when the celebration of Halloween spilled out onto the streets and into nightclubs, after decades in churches or community centers. Now, people spring for the s-e-x-y-stuff because its mass-produced and therefore cheap, and no one cares if it looks cheap, because it doesnt need to last longer than a night”. In fact, recently some take Mean Girls advice too seriously.


“We like to call it Slutty Halloween. After 2004’s Mean Girls, Slutty Halloween truly became a ‘thing’. Now, Halloween is a chance for normal girls to crank their assets up to their chin and embrace their slaggy alter egos for a night. Halloween offers the chance to dress slutty. But there’s a very practical reason for forgoing Slutty Halloween: it’s cold”, some say. But many don’t care if it’s cold or it’s hot, they only follow the fashion. Some ask: “How can we solve the s-e-x-y Halloween problem?”, and some answer: “there is no way; It makes people hate you!” Such a brilliant answer! Of course, many truly think that having fun is much more better than thinking about death, ghosts, zombies, etc. They say: “Lets have fun for one night; that’s all”.


Halloween or Hallow-een has a funny meaning in Persian Language. In fact, “Halloo” or Hallow” in Persian means “idiot”, so Halloween means “festival of idiots”. As you know, the old Halloween and its root in Iran, was really stupid. But now, many only want to have fun. And it’s not bad; it’s really good. But those who still care about ghosts, zombies, etc or those who are like sheep and only follow the fashion, make Halloween the festival of idiots. Some Americans say: “Halloween is its third-largest season after Valentines Day and Christmas. It’s big business now, and as those in the $7 billion American Halloween industry will tell you, money is always s-e-x-y. Not surprisingly, a s-e-x-y-money costume can be yours for $30”.

Those who care about the fashion world, should watch Robert Altman’s Ready to Wear (1994) . It’s a black comedy about the fashion world and its stupidities. It’s not one of Altman’s good movies, but it’s not a bad movie. Its subject and what Altman wants to say, specially at the end of the movie, are interesting.

Best Movies: “Stranger Than Fiction” (2006)

September 24, 2011

Some movies are made only once in a decade. And “Stranger Than Fiction” (2006) is one of them. I think “Stranger Than Fiction” is a 8+/10 movie. The story is extraordinary and unique, and the whole cast is quite good, from Will Ferrell and Maggie Gyllenhaal to Dustin Hoffman and Emma Thompson. In fact, “Stranger Than Fiction” is the best movie of Ferrell and Gyllenhaal. They are both great in this movie. Ferrell is exceptional as Harold Crick, an IRS-agent whose lonely life is only soothed by his regular cataloguing of the mundane details of his existence. The main story and the main themes of the movie are really good. One day, Harold Crick’s world is upset by the introduction of a voice in his head. The voice is narrating everything he does (the doctors think it’s a schizophrenia). But when the voice informs Harold that his demise is imminent, he enlists literature professor Jules Hilbert (Dustin Hoffman) to try to get to the bottom of what is happening to him. Together they try to figure out what kind of story Harold’s life is turning into, be it a comedy or a tragedy, and if the plot is something he can take control of or is out of his hands . Harold’s life is an example of our life. Like Harold, we, all, should try to test our life, to see if it’s a comedy or tragedy !! or we can take control of it or it’s out of our hands. What Harold does for testing his life and the genre of his story, is really interesting. It’s what we should do about our own real life !!


Harold’s life is a comedy, but unfortunately or fortunately the real life is not comedy. Some say: “It’s a tragedy, or in the best case, is a tragicomedy”. But like Harold we should try to learn how we can face the tragedy, how we can avoid living a stupid nonsense life, and how we can live our life. One of the main things Harold pursues is his crush on Ana Pascal, the rebel baker who has left the Harvard for baking cookies. Ana says: “I wanted to change the world; so I went to the Harvard. I was gonna make the world a better place with my degree … But finally I understood that I can change the world by bakery, too”. Ana Pascal, she’s played by Maggie Gyllenhaal, is a lovely girl; a lovely revolutionary who refuses to pay her taxes, based on intellectual reasons. She is sarcastic, witty, and a smart alike. When Harold showed up to do her audit, her rejection and her reactions are very interesting. Of course, Harold’s life is an imaginary life and finally becomes a cliché, but it still can be a good example of our real life. Harold’s life that is written by an author, and is out of his control, has some meaningful similarities with the real life. Sometimes our life is out of our control, and sometimes we think our life, or part of it, is written by others or by an unknown author. Harold, like all of us, doesn’t want to die, too. But the literature professor (Dustin Hoffman) asks him to accept his death, and says: “You will die. [We can not run away from death]. Even if you avoid this death, another will find you. And I guarantee you, it won’t be nearly as poetic or meaningful as this one”. But Harold challenges him. Harold’s challenges are common challenges, i.e. the human challenges with the tragedy of life. And Harold’s final decision is a common choice, too.


Stranger Than Fiction is written by a relative newcomer, Zach Helm, and directed by Marc Foster, who is the director of ”Finding Neverland” and ”Monster’s Ball’. Zach and Foster, both did a great job in Stranger Than Fiction. An American critic, who has watched the film in the cinema, said: “When I first walked out of the movie theatre on a Friday night after seeing Stranger Than Fiction, I couldn’t believe what a good time I had. As soon as we were done, my friend and I knew why some people hated it (they wanted a silly movie) and others loved it (they were open to something more unique). We both fell in the latter category. For the next several days, every time my friend and I were in contact, we talked about it. Stranger Than Fiction stuck with us, and it just got better with age”. We have watched the DVD of Stranger Than Fiction, and had the same experience. I think some Iranians have watched it in the state TV. Recently, the Iran’s state TV showed it again, of course with many stupid censorship. “Stranger Than Fiction” has not any censorable scene, but the stupid Mullahs only try to f-u-c-k everything as much as they can! (the movie is about 105 min, and when the Mullahs showed it in 2007, they showed 95 min of it, and now in 2011 they showed 80 min of it !!) Anyway, if you want to see a good comedy and think about human life, you can see Stranger Than Fiction’s DVD (without Mullah censorship).

Scarlett Johansson and Leaked Photos (Videos)

September 16, 2011

Scarlett Johansson’s pictures have leaked on the Internet. Scarlett Johansson, 26, has admitted that she took naked photographs of herself which were leaked online. “The FBI has been called in to investigate how the private photographs were hacked from her mobile phone”, the media reported. Now some ask: “Are these photos are really private and leaked by hackers or … ?” And some say: “That seems like one of those dumb things celebrities do with smart phones. Some of them really wish that some one leaks their photos ! And some of them are victim of hacking. But keep doing what your doing Scarlett”. The issue of the private photos or videos of the celebrities is very controversial. It’s so obvious that publishing “the personal and private” photos or videos of the ordinary people is not acceptable at all, but are photos or videos of the celebrities (especially in the public space) are unpunishable too (in the name of privacy right, etc)?


The lawyers of the celebrities often talk about “the copyright law”, that means they (and their clients) only want money, and really don’t care about the privacy issue. They threatened to sue any media which publishes the pictures, in the name of copyright matters. Many think that the media hype and the copyright shits are just an excuse for making more money for the celebrities. Some say: “All celebrities should know that many eyes watch them, and many people are curious about their private life. The celebrities should stop playing with public opinion. The people that make the celebrities hero and rich, have right to see some private photos of them!” Even if the non-political celebrities were exempted from this rule, the politicians and the clergymen not only are not exempted from this rule, but the people should try to leak the photos and videos of these hypocrite bastards as much as possible.


The leaked private photos or videos of the celebrities is a global issue. In the recent years, many Iranian celebrities have been victim of leaked s-e-x videos. The most controversial case was the case of Zahra Amir Ebrahimi. Many Iranians saw her s-e-x video that was leaked by her ex-boyfriend. She lost her job and the Mullahs did not allow her to continue her job as an actress ! But the leaked videos of the Mullahs have a different story. The Mullahs or the Islamists are very very hypocrite. As you know, this fact that the Mullahs, who force Iranian women to wear Hejab and impose many other stupid things on Iranian youths, themselves have many illegal s-e-x or rape men or women is very very shameful, but what they do about their leaked videos is really more shameful. “The Mullahs raped men and women without any shame. Have you forgotten the case of Zanjan University? The Basiji professor wanted to rape a female student is his office, but when she taped and leaked the case, the Mullahs not only did not arrest the rapist, but they arrested the poor girl ! And that Basiji rapist even did not lose his job !! It’s the Mullah logic”, some Iranian say


In the recent years, Iranians have heard about many stories of the Mullah rapists and the Basiji rapists, but in almost all cases the rapists have been freed soon or even have not been arrested at all. In a leak video of the Mullahs, a robed cleric is caught on a hidden camera in a private room. ‘He walks to the door to let a chador-clad woman enter. Nobody saw you come in, did they? he asks her first. The cleric was apparently a member of the government-run Friday Prayers Committee in Hamedan province. He was a married cleric. “One thing we had never seen before was a clerics naked butt, commented one young Iranian below the online video clip. Iranians glee at exposing such hypocrisy, however, is tinged by another sentiment: anger”, the media reported in 2008.


The media also added: “Many remember how last year -ironically in the same province of Hamedan- a medical student (Zahra Bani-yaghub) was arrested by the Morality Police for sitting with her fiancé in a public park. When her family was finally allowed to visit her 48 hours later, they were asked to remove her lifeless body . The state blocked an investigation by warning that any discussion would only give the enemys propagandists their much-needed opportunity to attack us. Some months ago, the Tehran police chief, Zareie, was found to have an odd fetish, ordering six prostitutes to say their prayers before him while naked (he is currently free on bail). The Mullah Police chief, Zareie, was the head of the Mullah Moral Police of Tehran !! ” the media reported. It’s really so ridiculous and so shameful. It’s the Mullah logic.


“Johansson is the latest victim of the phone-hacking ring thought to be responsible for stealing naked photos and videos from at least 50 female Hollywood celebrities. Others include: Jessica Alba, Selena Gomez, Demi Lovato, Christina Aguilera, Vanessa Hudgens, etc”, the media reported. Some say: “Scarlett Johansson should try to be like her roles in the Woody Allen’s movies. She should not play with public opinion. Don’t be stupid Scarlett. Either don’t take nude photos, or lets people enjoy them too!” Anyway, If you take nude photo of yourself, and really don’t want that others see it, don’t save it in your cell phone or laptop.

Iranian Celebrities in 1970s and 2010s

September 14, 2011

The story of Iranian celebrities in the past decades can show us how Iran and Iranians changed. In fact, they show us what have changed and what have not changed in Iran. Iranian Celebrities before and after the Islamic Revolution have their own similarities and differences with each other. But the main common feature is that: “The vast majority of them are Khayemal (ass-licker)”. The vast majority of Iranian celebrities, before and after the Islamic revolution, are really stupid and sycophant. They kiss the ass of people in authority, and sell themselves to the authorities. It’s really shameful. But now, 30 years after the Islamic revolution, the younger generation of Iranian celebrities are much more educated, talented, smarter, and even much more beautiful than their counterparts in the Pahlavi era. Some say: “Almost all celebrities of that era were stupid and Javad, like Javad Yasari ! or Shahram Shab-Pareh ! (Shahram the Moth!). Of course, there were some exceptions, like Googoosh”. In fact, Googoosh was the greatest celebrity before the Islamic revolution.


Except Googoosh and a dozen, almost all other old Iranian celebrities seem really stupid. Some say: “When you look at the pictures of the celebrities of the Pahlavi era, the pictures of ,for example, Ebi, Shahram Shab-Pareh, NooshAfarin, Satter, etc that were the famous young celebrities of that era, you can understand that many of them were Oskol ! (retard), exactly like the people of that era !”. It’s a very funny fact. Some say: “the first and leading roles of the best movies at that era and the present time, i.e. the heroes that the ordinary people love them, can show us many things. In that era, they were hooligans, illiterate thugs, or the poor people. And now, they are university students, intellects, or the rich people.” It’s really funny. Indeed, in 1970s almost all Iranians, from the celebrities and intellectuals to the ordinary people and the authorities were Oskol (retard)! As we said before, now for example many Iranian families choose Iranian names for their children , but at that time, even the stupid Pahlavi family chose Islamic-Arabic names for their children (Reza, Ali-Reza, Gholam-Reza !, etc).


As we said before, Iran in 1960s and 1970s had many serious problems and paradoxes. The pictures of the famous celebrities of that era, like Leila Forouhar, Shahram Shab-Pareh, Naser Hejazi, Parvin, Sattar, etc or the scenes of the Iranian movies of that time, are really funny and can show us many things. Some say: “The celebrities of that time, and the stupid movies of that time, both were Ab-Gooshti (cheap and nasty). When some one like Parvin, the stupid footballer, was a famous celebrity of that era, it shows us that the majority of the people of that time were really Oskol (retard). The stupid Parvin was a illiterate thug that even “could not speak like Adam” (it’s a Persian slang that means “he was very stupid and could not speak well”), but the majority of Iranians, that were stupid, loved him ! Now, the majority of Iranians, that are young, only laugh at some one like the stupid Parvin, Shahram Shab-Pareh, Javad Yasari, and many other stupid celebrities of that era.”


In fact, many old Iranian celebrities are like Shahram Shab-Pareh, who is still a real stupid. Some say: “While his old girlfriend, Leila Forouhar, has become an acceptable celebrity, but the stupid Shahram is still very stupid. The brother of Shahram Shab-Pareh works with the Mullahs, especially Mr. shit. He has a Satellite Channel, but his main office is in Tehran ! Shahram Shab-Pareh and many other stupid old celebrities who live in LA, are really Oskol and Khayemal. In the recent years, they work with the Mullahs and the Mullah mafia. In fact, they are like many stupid Monarchists in the US, who work with the Mullahs openly or secretly. Last year, Mr. shit’s team said that “Moeen”, “Bijan Mortazavi”, “Habib”, and some other stupid celebrities who live in exile (in LA), accepted Mr. shit’s invitation and came Iran !! These stupid bastards showed that they are dead bastards.” It’s very funny. In fact, in the recent years no one care about the stupid Iranian celebrities in the US. The majority of them are dead bastards.

As we said before, after the Islamic revolution, Iranian female film stars and Iranian celebrities have the main problem of the older generations, i.e. the majority of them are stupid and Khayemal (ass-licker). But there are some significant differences between them. The young celebrities are not illiterate. They have not any family restriction for working as an artist. Of course, the Mullah restrictions, i.e. the official Islamic restrictions, are much more than the Pahlavi era; for example the women can not become singer or dancer, because it’s against the Mullah laws!, but in the Pahlavi era the majority of Iranian families did not allow their children to work as actor, singer, dancer, etc. In fact, the majority of Iranians were stupid or illiterate, and while there were no legal restriction, they did not allow their children, especially their girls, to engage in any artistic activity. So, a small minority of the people became artist, and they were not the most talented ones.


After the Islamic revolution, especially in 2000s, the younger generations of Iranians did not have the stupid restrictions of the older generations. The majority of them were educated and did not have any family restriction for working as an actor. Of course, they have a new set of dreadful restrictions, i.e. the Mullah restrictions. But the Mullah restrictions can not stop them. Now many ordinary young people, especially girls, engage in artistic or athletic activities. Their number is not comparable to the Pahlavi era. Now, many things have changed. Now, almost all Iranian celebrities are independent of the past. In 1990s and before that, few celebrities gained reputations because they were like the old celebrities. For instance, Mahnaz Afshar gained a reputation because she was like Googoosh. But other celebrities, especially in 2000s, were totally independent of the past. The celebrities like Niki Karimi, Katayoon Riahi (above picture), Leila Otradi (below picture), Reza Golzar, and many others not only did not look like the old celebrities, but they were much more talented and even beautiful than them. Of course, they are as Khayemal as the older generations !


In the past decades, at least since the mid-1990s, the Iranian youths have fought for what they want, and have changed the Mullah red lines. In fact, the youth forced the Mullahs to reconsider their stupid red lines. Each year, the Mullahs are forced to change their stupid red lines, and draw new red lines, because the majority of Iranian youths challenge the Mullah red lines and cross them. In fact, in a constant battle between the Mullahs and the youths, the Mullahs retreat constantly and the youths advance more and more. It’s an undeniable fact . Just take a look at the Iranian society and its changes between 2000s and 2010s or between 1990s and 2010s. Iran has changed a lot. You can be sure that the Mullahs would lose the battle in the near future. Now, the Mullahs have reached the end of the line.

Seeing Films in Mullah TV: Baaria (2009)

September 11, 2011

This weekend, the Mullah TV showed Baarìa (2009) , a film directed by Giuseppe Tornatore. Baaria is Sicilian slang for Bagheria where Tornatore was born and this is an autobiographic epic of three generations in the Sicilian village where he was born. The Baaria’s runtime is about 150 min, but the Mullah TV showed it in 80 min !! that means about half of the movie had been censored !! Baaria is not a good film; Baaria” is not a masterpiece, but when we saw it in the Mullah TV, it had became a total disaster, a true headache !, a collection of stupid irrelevant scenes ! You could not understand the main story and the main subject of the film !, and also many scenes and many characters of the film. It’s was really ridiculous. “Why these bastards, the Mullahs, show Tornatore’s movies in their stupid TV? When we saw “Cinema Paradiso” (1989) in the Mullah TV, it was a complete disaster. But when we saw “Cinema Paradiso” DVD, it was another film!, a great film! In fact, more than 50% of “Cinema Paradiso” had been censored in the Mullah TV, many its key scenes and subjects !! The same is true about Baaria, 1900, etc”, some Iranian film lovers say. It’s really ridiculous. The stupid Mullahs show a famous film, while they censor 50% of it !, and then the famous film becomes a very stupid nonsense film !


We only saw the lower part of the film’s poster in the Mullah TV, and the upper part were totally censored. “Baaria is a comedy film. In fact, it’s Tornatore’s “Amarcord”, the critics say. But when we saw it in the Mullah TV, it was a stupid nonsense shit ! All comic parts of it, had been censored !! “Featuring guest appearances by Monica Bellucci, Baaria is another “Malena” … Peppino’s daughter calling her father a fascist for not allowing her to wear a mini-skirt”, the critics add. But we did not see Monica Bellucci nor many other female roles of the movie !! All female stories of the film had been totally censored !!, even the main story of the film, the love story of the first female role ! In the recent weeks, the Mullah TV also showed “Spartacus” (directed by Stanley Kubrick) with many censorship. “At least 40% of the movie had been censored !! Why these bastards try to show the classic films, while they want to censor 50% of a classic film ?! The Mullahs censor the real life, the virtual life and even the dreams. These bastards censor everything and think the people have not any alternative in 21st century. But almost all Iranians, even in the small villages, have Satellite dishes and see Satellite channels, and laugh at the stupid bastards, the Mullahs. These bastards censor the movies in the name of ‘Moral values’, while they rape the men and women in the prisons and also in the private parties”, some Iranian say. It’s one of the greatest jokes of the Mullah era.

Iranian Film Stars, Actors

July 15, 2011

The outside world knows nothing about Iranian actors and actresses. Iran is isolated by the Mullahs and their Western supporters, and is not part of the International community. It has caused a lot problems for all Iranians, including Iranian actors. As we said before, the Iranian female film stars and all Iranian actors had their own weak and strong points. They could be global film stars if the Mullah regime is toppled, but the number of Iranian celebrities who are not Khayemal (ass-licker) are really small, and the majority of this tiny minority are women. Now lets take a quick look at the most famous Iranian actors.

Reza Golzar

Reza Golzar, is the star of 2000s. His fans think that he is a super star. Golzar is not a very bad actor, but his films, like almost all Iranian films in the recent years, are really cheap and nasty. Of course, he and Mahnaz Afshar have some movies with each other that are not as dreadful as other Iranian movies.


Bahram Radan

His fans think that he is “Iranian Leo Dicaprio” !! He and Mahnaz Afshar began their works at the same time and by a very cheap film. But after that Radan tried to learn something. He wanted to become a real actor, but he was not very successful, although he has some movies that are a bit better than his first shitty films.


Actors like Parviz Parastouie, Reza Kianan, Akbar Abdi, Ezzat Entezami, Farhad Aslani, Reza Attaran, Hamid Farokhnejad, Amin Hayaei (8 below pictures), Mehdi Hashemi, etc are good actors but the majority of them are Khayemal (ass-licker). Some of them, like Akbar Abdi and Amin Hayaei, are very stupid and Khayemal, and some of them like Kianian and Entezami are Khayemal, but less than others. And some of them are like Attaran, who was arrested in July 2009, in front of Ghoba Square. He was one of the Iranian protesters in that day.


While many American actors are civil activist or political activist, the Iranian actors are very conservative. In fact, the majority of them are really stupid and uneducated, and others prefer to be silent and are frightened of being arrested. Of course, remaining silent is understandable, but unfortunately many of Iranian actors are opportunists and try to kiss the Mullahs’ ass and think that the people would forget or forgive their shameful acts.


Some of young Iranian actors have been arrested during the Iranian protests. Ramin Parchami is one of them that still is in the prison. And in the recent days, Pegah Ahangarani, a young female actor, has been arrested. Prior to her arrest, Ahangarani had been expected to report on the 2011 Womens World Cup for Germanys Deutsche Welle.


As we said before, the majority of Iranian celebrities have not talked publicly about the Mullah coup and the people movement. And a considerable number of them have kissed the Mullahs’ ass. It’s really shameful. Of course a minority of Iranian celebrities, including some film directors, some theater directors, some play writers, etc have defended the Iranian movement, and some of them have paid its price. It’s so obvious that when the majority of Iranian film makers are stupid and Khayemal, then the Mullah cinema should be bankrupted. In fact, the average number of Iranian cinema goers has reduced to about 250,000 per month !, i.e. less than 0.3% of Iran’s population ! And an Iranian film is seen by about 50,000 viewers ! (the average number of viewers) It’s really one of the Mullah’s miracles and a clear sign of the Islamists’ bankruptcy in Iran.

When Iranians Boycott Celebrities

June 18, 2011

The state TV, the Khamenei propaganda machine, aired a program about a movie called “Thesis”, that is about the coup or the huge election fraud of 2009. In the recent weeks, some Iranian bloggers launched a campaign for boycotting the cast and crew of the stupid Movie. As we said before, many of Iranian celebrities are mercenary and Khayemal (who kiss the dictator’s balls or ass). The stupid Khamenei propaganda machine spent the people’s money, the oil money, on making this movie, but many actors rejected their generous offers only because they were frightened of the people backlash, and just a bunch of rats worked for them.


But who is these rats? Are they Basiji or Islamist? No, they are just opportunist and Khayemal. They are not believer; They are just ass-licker, and it really shows us the depth of the Islamists’ bankruptcy in Iran. When the supporters of a system are only a bunch of opportunists and ass-licker, then we can be sure about the imminent fall of the system . The Mullah regime even has not a dozen supporters among the artists. The rats that work with Mullahs are hypocrite charlatans, who want to make a deal with the Mullahs to ignore their non-Islamic behaviors. The rats don’t care about Mullahs, Islam and Muslims. They only disgrace themselves and the Islamic regime, and are a sign of the imminent fall of the Islamic regime. The celebrities that work with the Mullahs, become notorious and the people boycott them. The story of the singers and athletes who licked the dictator’s ass, is another version of the Iranian ‘Crime and Punishment’

Are There Funny Women?

June 16, 2011

“Are there funny women? Yes. Are there many funny women? No !” It’s what many people think, but it’s not true. The number of funny women at least is equal to the number of the funny men. Are there many funny men? it’s dependent on your views about being funny and funny people and your experiences. Without doubt, the number of the people that love hearing a joke and care about humor, is really large but the majority of them are women, not men ! We know that the men use the humor as a tool for attracting or deceiving the women ! Of course the number of female comedians and female humorists is less than the men, and it’s a funny paradox. In fact, this paradox have made doubts about the real number of funny women. But one of the funniest comedian and humorists, who is much more funnier than many funny men, is a woman: “Tina Fay“. After graduating from the University of Virginia in 1992, Fey moved to Chicago to take classes at the improvisational comedy group The Second City, where she became a featured player in 1994.


Three years later, Fey became a writer for the sketch comedy show Saturday Night Live (SNL) . She was promoted to the position of head writer in 1999. She is SNL’s first-ever female head writer. The following year, Fey was added to the cast of SNL. After leaving SNL in 2006, she created her own television series called 30 Rock, a situation comedy loosely based on her experiences at SNL . In the series, Fey portrays the head writer of a fictional sketch comedy series. In 2004, Fey made her film debut as writer and co-star of the teen comedy Mean Girls, one of the best comedy films of 2000s . In 2009, Fey won an Emmy Award for her satirical portrayal of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin in a guest appearance on SNL. Tina Fay can be enough for proving this matter that the women could be the best comedians or humorists. As we said before the writer of the masterpiece “Kurt Vonneguts Commencement Address at MIT”, was not Vonneguts, it’s Mary Schmich, a funny woman


Some westerners’ comments about the issue of funny women and men are interesting: “I have worked in workplaces that are female dominated, and male dominated, and telling jokes and making each other laugh is far more commonplace in male workplaces. I imagine there are deep-rooted cultural reasons for this … My wife will read my horror, sci-fi, action thrillers, and Fantasy books. I’d rather chew on a shotgun than read her chick lit … I laughed quite a lot through Baby Mama and Mean Girls. both excellent films (Tina Fay’s movies) … we are a lot of funny women like Julia Davis, the cast of Ab Fab, Tina Fay, Shappi Khorsandi, Katherine Parkinson, Sally Philips, Amelia Bullmore, Janeane Garofalo, Jamie Lee Curtis, Daisy Donovan, Renee Zellweger, etc … I love “Bridget Jones Diary” and Renee Zellweger … I love “There’s Something About Mary” and Cameron Diaz … Vicky Cristina Barcelona was a funny film with strong female leads … I love “The Sweetest Thing” and Cameron Diaz, she was funny”

Iranian female Film Stars

May 23, 2011

The outside world know nothing about Iranian film stars. Iran is isolated by the Mullahs and the Islamic regime and is not part of the International community. It has caused a lot problems for all Iranians, including Iranian film starts. Iranian actors and actresses, that some of them are educated and familiar with the world, could be global film stars if the Islamic regime is toppled. Now lets take a look at some of Iranian female film stars.

Niki Karimi

Niki Karimi is the first woman that became a big female film star after the Islamic revolution. In 1990s, she was the number one star of Iranian films. She has tried to be an intellect, and has learned English and translated some books from English into Persian. Niki Karimi is one of the first Iranian film stars who learned English and was an active member of film festival’s jury, like Cannes, Venice, etc.


Niki Karimi is a film actor that has become a film director. She was assistance/friend of Abbas Khayemal (Abbas Ass-Kisser!), i.e. who you know him as “Abbas Kiarostami” (but I prefer to call him “Abbas “Khayemal”). Niki Karimi was a friend of “Abbas Khayemal”, but she is not as stupid as Abbas Khayemal, who sell himself, his friends and the people to the Mullahs and Islamic regime. As a film director, Niki Karimi’s movies are not as shitty as Abass Khayemal’s movies (he has just one or two semi-good movie, that made it by chance). Niki Karimi has been on the people’s side and has not sold herself to the Mullahs, like Abbas Khayemal and many other Iranian stupid celebrities.

Mahnaz Afshar

Mahnaz Afshar is the second famous Iranian female film star. She is not as smart as and also as arrogant as Niki Karimi, but she is a good girl, a good simple-minded girl. Many of stupid Iranian film critics (charlatans), make use of her low self esteem for flirting with her and for laughing at her. Mahnaz Afshar should learn something from Niki Karimi and how she laugh at almost all stupid Iranian film critics. Of course, the film actors don’t need a big brain, and even a very small brain is enough for them.


Other Iranian film stars are pretty and attractive, but they are Khayemal (ass-kisser) and stupid, like the great “Abbas Khayemal”! Unfortunately the majority of Iranian film stars are dumb or charlatan.


The number of smart and open-minded film stars in Iran are really small, maybe like any other parts of the world. Taraneh Alidousti (she has worn black dress in the below picture) is one of these exceptions. Taraneh Alidousti and a small group of other Iranian film actors or film directors, including Fatemeh MotamedAria, have not sold themselves to the Mullahs.


Fatemeh MotamedAria

If Mahnaz Afshar and Niki Karimi were considered as Iranian Kate Winslet and Iranian Charlize Theron, then Fatemeh MotamedAria is definitely could be considered as Iranian Meryl Streep! Fatemeh MotamedAria is a very good actress, even if she is not very beautiful and very attractive.


Iranians film stars certainly have the potential for growth, and becoming international film stars. But their biggest obstacle is like the biggest obstacle of other Iranians: “The Mullahs and their Islamic regime”

Cannes Film Festival 64th

May 23, 2011

The 64th annual Cannes Film Festival was held from May 11 to May 22, 2011. The jury president was Robert De Niro, his jury colleagues were some one like Uma Thurman and Jude Law, the opening film was Midnight in Paris, written and directed by Woody Allen. The Italian film director Bernardo Bertolucci was presented with the inaugural Honorary Palme d’Or Award at the opening ceremony of the festival. Yesterday, Cannes Festival’s website announced the winners. Terrence Malicks “The Tree of Life (2011)” got the Palme dOr. The Tree of Life stars Brad Pitt as a domineering father in late 50s Texas, and Sean Penn as his son in the present day, struggling to cope with his brother’s premature death. Jury president Robert De Niro explained after the ceremony that it had been The Tree of Life’s grand scale and ambition that finally clinched it. “It seemed to have the size, the importance, the tension to fit the prize.” But there was the suggestion that it wasn’t a wholly unanimous decision. “Few films are 100%,” said De Niro. “But most of us thought it was great.”

The 64th annual Cannes Film Festival was another s-e-x-y Cannes! A film critic wrote: “The programmers seemed to group themes in batches this year, so the early days of the festival had female film-makers, then we moved through a couple of days of s-e-x and paedophilia (bordello movie The House of Tolerance, Austrian film Michael), before fathers and sons took over (Tree of Life, Le Gamin au Vélo, Footnote), then French politics (La Conquête, Pater), then depression (The Beaver, Melancholia), antisemitism (The Beaver, Melancholia) and, eventually, s-e-x-u-a-l politics (Almodóvar’s The Skin I Live In, The Source).” Apparently, Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris” was better than other Cannes’ movies, and even Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, who playing a deadpan, tolerant museum guide was not very bad. I’ve not seen the movie, but some Iranians have seen the movie in Iran !, and say that it’s not as bad as they heard about it.


Lars von Trier and his “Melancholia”, or as Iranians say “Malikholia”, were controversial. Lars von Trier at the Melancholia press conference said: “I understands Hitler. He did some wrong things, absolutely, but I can see him sitting there in his bunker at the end … I sympathise with him, yes, a little bit … I thought I was a Jew for a long time and was very happy being a Jew … Then it turned out that I was not a Jew … I found out that I was really a Nazi which also gave me some pleasure … But come on, I am not for the second world war, and I am not against Jews. I am very much for Jews; well not too much because Israel is a pain in the ass. But still, how can I get out of this sentence … OK I’m a Nazi” I thinkLars von Trier has “Melancholia”! and should be treated for melancholia. Von Trier has said before that after his Jewish father died, he was told that this was not his biological father. Reports are saying he found out his biological father was a German Christian. Melancholia movie, is about the end of the world, about a rogue planet on a collision course with Earth. Some people say: “Banning Von Trier from Cannes should be an embarrassment for the film festival not for Von Trier.” And some people said: “Shame on stupid Lars Von Trier, who disgrace the human beings”. Von Trier claimed Dunst had insisted she be filmed naked for a scene in Melancholia. “And now she wants more,” claimed the Danish director. “That’s how women are, and Charlotte is behind this. They want a really hardcore film this time !, and I am doing my best. Von Trier also jokingly claimed he was writing a four-hour-long hardcore p-o-r-n film ! featuring Melancholia stars Charlotte Gainsbourg and Kirsten Dunst . It would, he said, contain “a lot of very, very unpleasant s-e-x”. “I said let’s have a lot of talking in it, and they said, ‘We don’t give a shit about the dialogue, we just want to have a lot of very very unpleasant s-e-x,’ and that’s what I am writing right now.” Some wise people tell him: “Let’s make a p-o-r-n film and call it art! ”


Pedro Almodóvar’s “The Skin I Live In (2011)” and Julia Leigh’s Sleeping Beauty(2011) gave both bad and good reviews. Some film critics say: “It’s another “Eyes Wide Shut”” and some others say: “Let’s make a p-o-r-n film and call it art! ” Pedro Almodóvar’s films are not very bad, but I think they are not very good, too. Gus Van Sant’s “Restless (2011)” should not be a bad movie. The plot and idea of Nanni Moretti’s Habemus Papam (We Have a Pope) seems very funny. The Italian comedy ‘We Have a Pope’ is on the relationship between the newly elected Pope and his therapist !! Apparently, many thought that “Habemus Papam” would give Palme d’Or Award. Iranian films and Iranian film makers were not in the Cannes 64th. Jafar Panahi’s short film, This Is Not a Film, was smuggled into the country on a USB stick buried inside a cake posted from Iran to Paris. Jafar Panahi gave a six-year prison term, and 20-year-ban on film-making, talking to the press and travelling abroad. Jafar Panahi is not like his friend Abbas Khayemal (Abbas Kiarostami), who sold himself to the Mullahs and the Islamic regime. Panahi tried to be the real voice of the people, so he has been accused of “colluding with the intention to commit crimes against the country’s national security and propaganda against the Islamic Republic”.